Thursday, August 26, 2010

August 26 2010: In America, housing IS the economy

Frances Benjamin Johnston Home sweet home 1939
"Chatham County, Georgia, Fahm Street, west side, Savannah; Row houses built about 1850; Torn down 1940 for Yamacraw Village housing"

Ilargi: There are still reports out there that claim US home prices have stabilized. I even read somewhere that there are areas where home sales have picked up. Americans' need for good news is insatiable. At least when it comes to their own little lives. If Lindsay Lohan would drop dead on the spot, they'd take it in stride. If New York cabbies get stabbed because they're muslim, many now think they have it coming.

But it’s Americans themselves who have it coming. When a 473,000 number for initial jobless claims is greeted with cheer, you know there’s something truly wrong. And you don’t even have to have added that another 200,000 fellow citizens fell off the wagon and into emergency jobless claims. In one single week.

US jobs paint a dismal picture. We're into this crisis since 2 or 3 years, depending on when you start counting, and there are no jobs being created. I read today, forget where, that there are as many people employed in US manufacturing as there were in 1940, when the overall population was roughly half of what it is today.

And we've known it for a long time, all the stats on this are clear as daylight: without a recovery in employment, there’s zero chance of a recovery in the housing market. When in the face of the lowest mortgage rates in a very long time existing home sales plummet 27.2%, the good news boys will have a very hard time convincing anyone. In fact, they've already lost the battle.

The party that tries the hardest to make you believe sunrise is just around the corner, sadly, is the US government. But then, they face elections, and what else are they going to do? They still need the media though, and in that group you can expect an increase in "heresy" when it comes to the happy growth message. There is a point where it all just becomes ridiculous.

So now you're looking at a government, and not just the White House, but all of Washington, that faces a choice too stark for it to make.

Obama and his people know what Yogi Berra once said: "When you come upon a fork in the road, take it". But they can't "take it", since they realize full well that both roads lead to their own destruction. And so they just remain standing, while the world around them, the one they're supposed to govern, continues to fall apart behind their backs.

What's that choice?

On the one hand, it's to keep on trying to prop up home prices through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's semi-private mortgage guarantees, increasingly aided and abetted by Ginnie Mae, the Federal Housing Administration, the Federal Home Loan Banks, and whatever else comes peeping up through the Capitol Hill alphabet bureau soup.

On the other, it's to leave home prices up to the markets to decide.

Now, the second option has the huge advantage of lasting a whole lot longer. But it also has the huge disadvantage of pushing prices downward, and without anyone knowing where the bottom will be.

Which is perceived as too scary, for incumbent political careers and for the established business interests that paid for those careers, in short: for the existing financial system as a whole.

Hence, even if they don't want to make a choice, they still do. Anything in the government's power to "stabilize" housing is used. The FHA offers 3.5% mortgages, Fannie and Freddie advertise ways to put no money down at all. The risks of these offers fall squarely on the back of the taxpayer.

But still, despite all the perverse incentives, Americans bought 27.2% fewer existing homes this July than they did a year ago. New home sales weren't much better.

It's starting to look like the game is up. Obama, Geithner, Summers, the power boys, stand at a fork in the road that leaves them two options: either their careers are certainly over in a few months, or they're maybe over in a year. Guess what they choose? They stick around as long as they can. Because they feel so greatly fulfilled, nay, humbled, by public service, it really soothes their souls.

They’ll keep doing what they can to keep US home prices from collapsing, even in the face of all that's happening around them. They’ll say the 27.2% was just a aberration. Hey, Obama said some two weeks ago that the US economy was on track. But on track to what exactly, sir?

During the past one or two decades, America’s economy has been, and increasingly so as it went along, dependent on the housing market. Homeowners and -buyers got to feel like they were making money every day just living in a home, brokers were raking in cash selling more and faster then they ever would have thought possible, and Wall Street took all that ant-like activity and leveraged it up the hilt in securities and other "innovative instruments".

Today, among the newly unemployed, there are scores of real estate agents, and even more construction workers, and their jobs simply are never ever coming back. America has a 12,5 month housing inventory glut, on top of millions of homes that are not even put on the market to begin with, and it will take decades to rectify the imbalance. There are now 18.9 million homes unoccupied in the US. There are also 3.5 million homeless. Many of whom are children. That, my friends, is America, today.

In the Great Depression, a lot of food was destroyed by American farmers while millions of citizens went without a decent meal. The sort of thing we see repeat itself right now.

Housing IS the US economy today.

For homeowners, who will lose all they have and more if prices keep on dropping. Which they will, just check "normal" price levels back to the 1960's-70's.

For construction workers, who were a huge part of the US labor force over the past 10-15 years.

For the mortgage industry, the brokers, flippers et al, who are all getting annihilated.

For the lending industry, who are all hugely invested in the market, even though the government bailed them out through Fannie and Freddie.

And for that same government, who have a seemingly impossible choice to make. Do they do what they know is right, because it's inevitable down the line, that is, let the market decide home prices, which would end their political careers in no time, or do they continue the pointless practice of propping up the zombie market, which puts a rapidly increasing burden on the shoulders of the US citizen, who already doesn’t have a nickel to scratch her behind with?

They won't do what's right by you, they'll do what’s right by themselves.

America needs open books. It needs to know what a home is "truly" worth, like it needs to know what the government debt is, and the deficit, it needs to know what its children can expect to pay for health care and education in the future, and what they can expect to get from their pension funds. All of this though, the entire picture, is so bleak that nobody you’ll vote for anytime soon will tell you anything anywhere near the truth.

Imagine what another 20%, 30% or 50% drop in home prices would do. To you yourself, to your neighbors, to your community, your town. And, in the end, the nation.

Well, guess what, it's coming. You can't have sales drop by 27.2%, and expect prices to remain the same, not even close.

It's somewhat funny to see that people like Business Insider's Henry Blodget are discovering that Fannie and Freddie have been used to raise US home prices; I’ve been saying that for years now. Then again, if Professor Lawrence Kotlikoff is right is his assessment that US debt is $202 triliion(!), what does it matter where the tidal wave comes from? Ya drown, you're dead. And that's a one-time affair.

Your government is standing paralyzed by terror at the fork in the road, and the fork is not standing still, it's forcing them to pick one way or the other. And their interests are not the same as yours. So get out of the way while you still can.

Existing Home Sales Plunge 27.2%, Prices to Follow
by Dirk van Dijk -

While everyone expected Existing Home Sales to drop in July, the drop was far more than expected. In July, used homes sold at an annual rate of just 3.83 million, the lowest level since 1996. That is a plunge of 27.2% from the June pace of 5.26 million, and is 25.5% lower than the year-ago pace of 5.14 million. The month-to-month decline is actually worse than it appears since the June numbers were revised down from a 5.37 million pace. So relative to where we though used home sales were running, the decline is actually 28.7%. It was also FAR below the consensus expectation for a 4.72 million pace.

Single-family home sales were down 27.1% on the month and down 25.6% year over year. Condo sales were down 28.1% for the month and 24.0% lower than last year. The plunge in sales comes even as the average mortgage rate fell to 4.56% from 4.74% in June and 5.22% last year. The first graph below (from shows the history of existing home sales.

Tax Credit Expired
Existing home sales had been propped up by the home buyer tax credit. To qualify, people had to reach an agreement by the end of April, but they had until the end of June to close on the sale, and existing home sales are recorded at closing. Thus there was a huge ($8,000) incentive to rush and close before the deadline. The tax credit was supposed to end last fall, but a last minute middle of the night extension (and actual expansion of the program) was added in Congress. That is why there is the earlier spike in the graph.

It is abundantly clear to me from the graph that the tax credit did almost no net good at all in stimulating home sales. All it did was shift the timing of the sales that would have otherwise occurred. Most of the activity actually happened in the first wave, and the extension and expansion did very little good. Expanding the program so that existing homeowners could participate was particularly stupid, since that does not even reduce the inventory on balance. Help for first-time buyers at least accomplished that, albeit by increasing the rental vacancy rate.

The worst month-to-month decline was in the Midwest where sales fell 35.0%, followed by the Northeast, down 29.5%. Sales in the South were down 22.6% and in the West they were down 25.0%. The pattern was similar for the year-over-year comps. The Midwest was down 33.3%, followed by a 30.3% decline in the Northeast, a 23.0% fall in the West and a 19.8% decline in Dixie.

The Party Is Over
So we threw a very expensive party, and now we are suffering from the hangover. The most important thing about existing home sales is not the direct impact that sales have on the economy. That impact is actually very minimal. Nothing is produced when an existing asset changes hands. Most of the economic activity associated with an existing home sale comes from people redecorating after they move into a "new for them" home. That helps stimulate sales for paint makers like PPG and carpet companies like Mohawk.

Relative to the size of the transaction, the effect on the overall economy is minimal. That is not the case with new home sales, each of which generates an enormous amount of economic activity and are traditionally the key to pulling the economy out of recessions.

The key reason why anyone should pay attention to used home sales is what they say about the direction of home prices. Housing is the principal store of wealth (or at least it used to be before prices collapsed) for the vast majority of American families. Housing wealth is far more evenly spread across the county than is stock market wealth. While many people might have a little bit of exposure to the stock market in their 401-k program, most equity wealth is held by the richest few percent of the people in the country.

While in the "new gilded age" of the past decade, the rich have built houses in the Hamptons that exceed the excesses of the Newport cottages of the last gilded age, none have $100 million homes, but $100 million stock fortunes are far from unheard of.

The key to the future direction of home prices is in the level of sales relative to the number of houses available in inventory.

Inventories of existing homes rose by 2.5% to 3.98 million. While that is still well below the record set in July of 2008 of 4.58 million homes, it is still a very high level. Just as with any store, the level of inventory has to be compared to the level of sales to be meaningful. The plunge in the level of sales, combined with the rise in the absolute level of inventories caused the months of supply to surge to 12.5 months from 8.9 months in June.

A healthy market has about six months of supply on hand, less than half the current level, and during the bubble, months of supply were routinely around 4 months. The current level is 1.4 months higher (12.6%) than the previous record of 11.1 months set in July 2008.

Well, what happens when a store has too much inventory, and customers are not coming through the door? The merchant starts to mark things down and has a sale. It is no coincidence at all that the previous bulge in the months of supply coincided with the most rapid period of falling home prices. While next month might see a slight rebound in sales from the July level, there is virtually no chance that it will recover to the April or May levels.  Thus, it is likely that the months of supply are going to stay elevated, most likely still in the double digits for several months to come.

Expect Falling Prices
Existing home prices are going to fall. If they didn’t, it would mean that the most fundamental of all economic laws, that of supply and demand, has been repealed. And I think the legislation to do that is stalled in committee in the Senate (just kidding). Fortunately, relative to rents and incomes, the price of houses are now roughly in line with historical norms, not wildly inflated the way they were a few years ago.

That, of course, does not mean that housing prices cannot over shoot to the downside, but it does mean that we will probably not see another 30% decline like we have seen since the top of the bubble. However, I would not rule out a decline on the order of 10 to 15% over the next few years.

The consequences of such a decline would be extremely serious. Housing is a very leveraged asset. In the stock market, using all of the 50% margin you normally have available to you is considered being extremely aggressive.  In housing, putting 20% down is considered being very conservative. During the bubble, it was common for people to put down less than 5% when buying a home.

As housing prices decline, more and more people will be pushed underwater on their mortgages. While there is no margin clerk with housing, forcing you to put up cash as soon as the home slips below the waves, it does have very serious consequences.  

If the value of a house is more than the amount of the mortgage or mortgages, the rate of foreclosures should be zero. Regardless of how cash-flow constrained the homeowner is, he is always going to be better off simply selling the home rather than letting the bank take it. If the value of the house is less than the mortgage, it is often in his best economic interest to simply stop paying his mortgage and let the bank take it, even if he has plenty of cash available to him.

How much that is in the homeowners advantage depends on how far below the waves the house is. There are plenty of non-economic considerations that go into that decision. For most people, after all, a house is a home, not simply an investment. People do care about what their neighbors say. They care about pulling their kids out of the schools they are attending to move to a new school district. Ruthlessly defaulting on your mortgage will hurt your credit score, as well, so there is an economic consideration.

Thus, most people who do have the cash flow available, will try to stay current on their mortgage. If they can’t do that they are likely to take the intermediate step of working with their bank to arrange a short sale, where the house gets sold, but the bank agrees to get less than the full amount of the mortgage, so people don’t have to bring a big check to closing.

For the most ruthless, though, the best bet is often to just stop paying the mortgage and live rent- and mortgage-free until the sheriff shows up at the door. Given the overhang of foreclosures (and the extremely sloppy record keeping at the mortgage firms as the mortgage has been passed from one investor to another and sliced and diced to make exotic securities), it is not uncommon for people to be able to "squat in their own house" for well over a year.

The "depth of the water" matters a great deal. Few people that have the cash flow available will decide to stop paying on their mortgage if they are only down by $1,000. But if the house is worth $50,000 or $100,000 less than the mortgage, then those non-economic factors are more likely to be overwhelmed. If the cash flow is not available, say because one or both of the breadwinners in the family has been laid off and can't find work after months and months of looking, then the decision to stop paying the mortgage becomes much easier.

Prices Have Not Started Sliding Yet
So far, we have not seen prices start to slide again. The median price of an existing home sold in July was actually 0.7% higher than it was a year ago (single family up 0.9%, condos down 1.7%). The tax credit did have the effect of propping up the prices of existing homes. After all, if a transaction is subsidized by a third party, both the buyer and the seller will split the benefit. In this case the buyer gets his benefit when he files his 1040, the seller gets hers through a higher sales price. That effect is likely to fade quickly in coming months, but did not seem to show up in the July numbers.

While the direct impact of existing home sales is not that serious, the implications of this report for future home prices are very dire. Falling home prices will mean more foreclosures, and that means more bad loans for the banks. People will also feel less wealthy, and they will respond by saving more and spending less, and that tends to slow the economy down.

If people planned to finance their retirement by selling off their home bought long ago at lower prices, they are not going to be able to have the sort of retirement they thought they would without additional money in the bank. If downsizing the home once the nest was empty was a big part of the college tuition plan, well, maybe the kids will just have to go to community college instead. Thus the impact of home prices is vital to the overall health of the economy, and existing home sales are significant in so far as they provide insight into them, not from the direct economic impact.

Looking Ahead to New Home Sales
The impact of new home sales, which will be released tomorrow, is much larger in terms of the growth of the economy. Since they are recorded when the contract is signed, they have already been suffering from the post-tax credit hangover. Thus the drop in July is not going to be anywhere near the size of the drop in existing home sales. Actually a slight increase to an annual rate of 334,000 is expected from the June rate of 330,000. That is still one of the lowest sales rates on record, and those records go all the way back to the early 1960’s.

If I had to pick a single reason why this recovery has been so anemic, it would be because to the exceptionally low rate of new home sales. Used homes are extremely good substitutes for new homes, and with the supply of used homes at record highs relative to sales, that is not exactly going to stimulate a lot of new home sales. Thus, the real problem is not just the hangover from the tax credit party, but the cirrhosis of the liver caused by the constant housing binge from 1997 to 2007. That damage is going to take more than just a few aspirin to cure.

U.S. New Homes Sales Drop to Record Low in July
by Courtney Schlisserman - Bloomberg

Sales of U.S. new homes unexpectedly dropped in July to the lowest level on record, signaling that even with cheaper prices and reduced borrowing costs the housing market is retreating. Purchases fell 12 percent from June to an annual pace of 276,000, the weakest since data began in 1963, figures from the Commerce Department showed today in Washington. The median price of $204,000 was the lowest since late 2003. A lack of jobs is hurting American’s confidence, leading to a plunge in home demand that threatens to undermine the one-year- old economic recovery. Builders are also competing with mounting foreclosures that are forcing down property values.

"The housing market’s recovery has taken a big step back," said Ryan Sweet, a senior economist at Moody’s in West Chester, Pennsylvania. "The improvement in the labor market is showing signs of fatigue and potential buyers are content to sit on the sidelines, which is understandable considering we have a near double-digit unemployment rate." Stocks held earlier losses after the report. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index fell 0.7 percent to 1,044.77 at 10:21 a.m. in New York. Treasury securities rose, sending the yield on the benchmark 10-year note down to 2.45 percent from 2.49 percent late yesterday.

Worse Than Forecast
Economists forecast new home sales would unchanged at a 330,000 annual pace, according to the median of 74 survey projections. Estimates ranged from 291,000 to 355,000. The government revised down the June figure to 315,000. The median price decreased 4.8 percent from July 2009. Purchases fell in all four regions, led by a 25 percent drop in the West. The supply of homes at the current sales rate climbed to 9.1 months’ worth from 8 months in June. There were 210,000 new houses on the market at the end of July, the same as the prior month. The timing of the tax incentive has caused some wide swings in sales data. New home purchases dropped in May after rising to a more than one-year high the prior month.

Record Plunge
Sales of existing homes plunged a record 27 percent last month, according to a report yesterday from the National Association of Realtors. Home resales are tabulated when a contract is closed, while new home sales are counted at the time an agreement is signed, making them a leading indicator of demand. The homebuyers tax credit required purchases to sign a contract by April 30. The deadline for closing was moved last month from June 30 to September 30. Even so, there was a rush to close ahead of the initial expiration date.

Foreclosures and short-sales are boosting the so-called shadow inventory, and competing with builders trying to sell properties as well. Home seizures increased almost 4 percent in July from the previous month, with 325,229 properties last month getting a notice of default, auction or bank repossession, RealtyTrac Inc. said Aug. 12. Housing’s inability to build on the temporary boost generated by government assistance is one reason the economy is having trouble strengthening.

Slowing Sales
Toll Brothers Inc., the largest U.S. luxury homebuilder, today reported that buyers signed contracts for 701 homes in the three months ended in July compared with 837 houses in the same period last year. "Our gross contract numbers were not impressive," Chairman Robert Toll said in a statement. "The acceleration we saw in deposits and traffic through the first few weeks of May was not sustained during the remainder of the quarter."

The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo confidence index this month dropped to the lowest level since March 2009. The Department of Housing and Urban Development plans to make loans of as much as $50,000 for borrowers "in hard hit local areas" to make mortgage, tax and insurance payments for as long as two years, according to an Aug. 11 statement. The Treasury Department will also provide as much as $2 billion in aid under an existing program for 17 states and the District of Columbia, according to the statement.

Also helping support some demand, mortgage rates have declined. The average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage dropped to a record-low 4.42 percent in the week ended Aug. 19, according to Freddie Mac. Private payrolls rose a less-than-forecast 71,000 in July and were revised down for the previous month, the Labor Department reported Aug. 6. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg forecast unemployment will end the year at 9.5 percent, unchanged from the rate in June and July.

Inventory Explodes Past the Worst of the Housing Crash
by Michael David White -

Soft demand for existing homes pushed up inventory to a record 12.5 months of sales and easily broke the previous high of 11.3 months scored in April 2008. By this basic measure, the price of homes may reasonably be expected to fall at the most torrential pace seen during our four-year-old crash.

Yet you will see only the most tepid warnings of this risk as described by the mainstream media with results released today being worse than the most pessimistic forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. Please review the chart (above) and note that it is in record territory for the history of months-of-inventory for sale.

“I expect double digit months-of-supply for some time – and that will be a really bad sign for house prices,” said Bill McBride of Calculated Risk, commenting on the biggest one-month drop in sales ever.

Today’s stats are the first release of existing-home-sales data that gives us a view of buyer demand without the hugely popular down-payment prop from the federal government. Please note that inventory in units was comparatively benign with little change from June (Please see units for sale above.). We estimate the excess of units on the market as 1.1 million of the 4 million for sale.

Prices for residential real estate have been flat since August 2009, but they have fallen 34% from their peak in the summer of 2006 (based upon the 120-year series by Case Shiller). Not one commentator I reviewed on today’s stats explained that the perils of the American housing market have deepened dramatically since the killer crash let up and paused a year ago.

New risk factors now include a flood of negative equity. Foreclosures in progress are at a record level. Fourteen percent of mortgages are behind on payments — about 7.7 million borrowers or, more starkly, one in seven. Please note that inventory for-sale plus the 7.7 million delinquent borrowers is a number which is massively larger than the average unit sales of 480,000 a month (Please see "X" in the chart above towering over "Z" – monthly sales).

The risk doesn’t stop at one-of-seven behind on payments. The cure rate on delinquent mortgages is effectively zero once the loan goes to 60-days late. A record 4.63 percent of borrowers are in foreclosure. Intermingled among this mayhem are approximately 13 million homeowners who have no equity or negative equity. They would make nothing from the sale of their house if they could sell it. Or they would have to write a big check to sell. They are prime candidates for strategic default. One occasionally sees whispered warnings of a tipping point with default achieving a cache as was once given to hula hoops or pet rocks or station wagons.

“You end up in a home-price-depreciation death spiral,” Laurie Goodman told the Wall Street Journal. She is senior managing director at Amherst Securities Group LP and considered a guru on mortgages.

Other risks include massive imbalances between the exaggerated value of debt assets (mortgages) used to buy homes and the current huge fall in the value of property. Property values have fallen FIFTEEN TIMES further than the balances of mortgages. A recent report also called attention to the fact that even after a 34% fall, property values today are higher than they have ever been in any prior bubble excepting for the current one that we are in.

The huge number of late payers proves that home prices remain too high with our current unemployment of 9.5% even if affordability has skyrocketed and interest rates have plummeted.

Demand has held up surprisingly well given the awful scary facts just recounted (See chart above for actual unit sales released today.).

We are in a battle to the death and only fools rush in to this market. Wise men run for the hills. My suggestion? Rent. Don’t Buy. If you own, sell. Then wait out the storm. We live in interesting times. Don’t make yourself a statistic of them.

Burning Down The House
bydavid Rosenberg - Gluskin Sheff

Once again, the consensus was fooled. It was looking for 330k on new home sales for July and instead they sank to a record low of 276k units at an annual rate. And, just to add insult to injury, June was revised down, to 315k from 330k. Just as resales undercut the 2009 depressed low by 15%, new home sales have done so by 19%. Imagine that even with mortgage rates down 100 basis points in the past year to historic lows, not to mention at least eight different government programs to spur homeownership, home sales have undercut the recession lows by double-digits.

This is what we have been saying for some time, in the aftermath of a credit bubble burst and a massive asset deflation, trauma has set in. The rupture to confidence and spending from our central bankers’ and policymakers’ willingness to allow the prior credit cycle to go parabolic has come at a heavy price in terms of future economic performance. Attitudes towards discretionary spending, credit and housing have been altered, likely for a generation.

The scars have apparently not healed from the horrific experience with defaults, delinquencies and deleveraging of the past two years — talk about a horror flick in 3D. The number of unsold homes on the market exceeds four million and that does include the shadow bank inventory, which jumped 12% alone in August, according to the venerable housing analyst Ivy Zelman. Nearly 1 in 4 of the population with a mortgage are "upside down" and as a result are now prisoners in their own home. We have over five million homeowners now either in the foreclosure process or seriously delinquent. The government’s HAMP program was supposed to bail out between 3 and 4 million distressed homeowners and instead we have only had a success rate of fewer than half a million.

Now back to the new home sales data. Every region in the U.S. was down, and down sharply. The homebuilders did not cut their inventory levels and as a result, the backlog of new homes surged to 9.1 months’ supply from 8.0 months in June, which means more discounting and margin squeeze is coming in the homebuilder space. As it stands, median new home prices were sliced 6% in July and this followed on the heels of a 4.7% drop in June. And, at $235,300, average new home prices are down to levels last seen in March 2003, down nearly 30% from the 2007 peak.

If the truth be told, if we are talking about reversing all the bubble appreciation that began a decade ago, then we are talking about another 15% downside from here. The excess inventory data alone tell us that this has a realistic chance of occurring.

The high-end market, in particular, is under tremendous pressure. In fact, it is becoming non-existent. Guess how many homes prices above $750k managed to sell in July. Answer — zero, nada, rien; and for the second month in a row. Only 1,000 units priced above 500,000 moved last month. That’s it! Over 80% of the homes that the builders managed to sell were priced for under $300,000. Just another sign of how this remains a full-fledged buyers’ market — at least for the ones that can either afford to put down a downpayment or are creditworthy enough to secure a mortgage loan (keeping in mind that 25% of the household sector does have a sub-600 FICO score).

Remember that this is a July data point and we know that the NAHB housing market index, which has an historic 83% correlation with new home sales, dipped for the third month in a row in August, to 13 from 14 in July. So it’s not even safe to say that we have hit rock bottom. Moreover, when you look at the trendline in total home sales, it is plain to see what has happened from the impact of the now-expired housing tax credits — the subsidy did little more than distort the pattern of housing demand and actually pulled forward well in excess of a million units of consumption, at the expense of future growth. What does this mean? That demand will remain anemic and likely hit even new lower lows in coming months and quarters as we enter into the "payback time" phase.

Why America stopped buying homes
by Felix Salmon - Reuters

Earlier this month, talking about a housing market unsupported by Uncle Sam’s billions, I said that “the entire housing-finance business in the U.S. would come to a screeching halt. No one could buy, no one could sell, and home values would be entirely hypothetical.” What I didn’t realize was that we were plunging towards that state of affairs even with the vigorous and active involvement of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The National Association of Realtors said sales dropped a record 27.2 percent from June to an annual rate of 3.83 million units, the lowest level since May 1995. This number is the lowest that the NAR has ever reported, and I can see why it spooked the markets, sending 10-year Treasuries breaking through the 2.5% level: we’re seeing less housing market activity now than we were even during the depths of the crisis. According to the NAR, there were 4.94 million existing homes sold in 2007, 4.34 million sold in 2008, and 4.57 million sold in 2009. The latest annualized number in that series, for July 2010, is just 3.37 million. That’s a 26% fall from last year’s rate.

The number is so low that it looks like a statistical aberration: let’s hope it is. Because if it isn’t, the news is gruesome. It means that despite record-low mortgage rates, people aren’t able to buy houses: essentially all the benefit from those low rates is going to people who already own their homes and are taking the opportunity to refinance.

The news also means that there’s a big gap between buyers and sellers: the market isn’t clearing. Sellers are convinced that their homes are worth lots of money, or will rise in price if they just hold out a bit longer; buyers are happily renting, waiting for prices to come down. And entrepreneurial types, whom one would expect to arbitrage the two by buying houses with super-cheap mortgages and renting them out at a profit, don’t seem to have found those opportunities yet.

Houses are rarely a liquid asset; they were, briefly, during the housing boom, but now they’re more illiquid than ever. America is a country where two generations of homeowners have learned to consider their houses an asset; they’re rapidly learning that at times like these, a house can look much more like a liability. (And refinancing your mortgage is just liability management.) The enormous repercussions of that change in mindset are only just beginning to be felt.

The fallacy of cheap home prices and the two income trap
by Dr. Housing Bubble

Housing inflation has run at an elevated pace since the 1970s and ramped up starting in the 1990s.  Yet what masked much of the pain was access to easy credit but also the rise of the two income household.  The housing bubble is worse than many expect and probably for the wrong reasons.  Many readers make the wrong assumption that because we are largely a two income household nation that home values had to rise simply because of this transition.  It was a simple 2 plus 2 calculation.  This is wrong and it is more likely that home values grew in the last decade more on the introduction of exotic mortgage products that didn’t rely on income measures.  There is little debate that many cities in California are still in major housing bubbles.  Yet nationwide home values are still overpriced by 25 percent.  Let us examine why.

Dual income households

Since the late 1960s there has been a steady rise in dual income households:

dual income workers

Source:  Tax Foundation

The above is a dramatic shift in the way we organize our household budgets.  Yet we also need to remember what caused the above shift.  In the 1950s and 1960s it was very doable for one blue collar job to support one household.  That is, purchasing a home with a 30 year fixed rate with one blue collar income was not an extraordinary accomplishment.  But what pushed the rate from 47% in 1967 to 67% today?  Of course the obvious part is the rise of women in the workforce but the more sinister reality is that households now need two incomes just to stay within the middle class.  It was more out of necessity.  You need only look at the data on manufacturing jobs to see the trend:

manufacturing jobs

We have the same raw number of people working in manufacturing as we did in the 1940s!  Of course our population has expanded dramatically over that time.  It is amazing that 4 out of 10 Americans work in the low paying service sector (i.e., McDonalds, Wal-Mart, cashiers, etc).  That is why the median household income of Americans is roughly $50,000 (in California it is roughly $60,000).  Now given the large amount of dual income households, you can do the math on individual wages.  The housing market inflation has been underplayed because you have dual income households working lower paying jobs.  So yes, income has gone up but the per capita wage for each individual has gone down.  Even with two incomes, the current price of housing in the U.S. is too high.  That is why the Federal Reserve has done everything imaginable to keep rates artificially low.  But guess what?  Unless they can throw in a third income to the household people won’t be buying.

Historical housing prices

When you tell people that housing prices are still too high, they looked shocked.  How can this be with such a dramatic correction?  They might agree on the merits of a handful of California areas but certainly not nationwide.  The reality is, nationwide home prices are overvalued by at least 25 percent:

case shiller home price index data

Now this is data going back to the 1880s.  For over 100 years home prices hovered around the 100 base point.  During the Great Depression, home prices were extremely affordable (but then again it was the Great Depression).  But even after that terrible economic time, home prices remained relatively affordable for nearly 50 years from 1940 to 1990.  All of sudden you begin to see spikes in this market.  What exactly happened here?  You have the S&L crisis but also the de-regulation of the financial markets.  In other words, we suddenly allowed toxic junk mortgages to enter into the system and turned the housing market into a wild casino.

Even after the dramatic spike and peak reached in the 2000s and subsequent slide, home prices still need to fall another 25 percent to be in line with historical data.  If this is the deepest crisis since the Great Depression you would expect that home values would at least make their way back to the 100 base point.  The mainstream media only relies on banking and housing pundits that have a vested interest in keeping home values inflated.  They don’t have any sense of what is going on in Main Street USA.  Just last week I saw someone (yet again) selling loads of cans and plastic bottles at the recycling center from their leased Jaguar!  Or another person was buying loads of items at a dollar store and had a Prada purse.  Sure these are anecdotes but things are changing.  And Americans have little faith in the stock market as they should:

“(MSNBC) Renewed economic uncertainty is testing Americans’ generation-long love affair with the stock market.

Investors withdrew a staggering $33.12 billion from domestic stock market mutual funds in the first seven months of this year, according to the Investment Company Institute, the mutual fund industry trade group. Now many are choosing investments they deem safer, like bonds.”

Why keep money in a stock market with no reform, flash crashes, and I-bankers fleecing the American people in their glorified casino?  The reason home sales have collapsed is the fact that the employment market is so weak and fragile.  People are shifting their spending habits to “needs” from “wants” and this has cratered many industries (no more Prada bags but $1 tooth brushes will work).  A giant McMansion has many substitutes.  You can lease a smaller home or condo.  In other words the demand for buying homes is highly elastic.

Income data

Elizabeth Warren, Professor of Law at Harvard has been a fantastic advocate for the middle class.  Her book on the two income trap is fantastic and highlights the slow erosion of the U.S. middle class.  Her data below shows that two incomes are not necessarily better than one given the current erosion of individual purchasing power:

fixed cost dual income

Now run the above numbers carefully.  The single-income family of 1970 had more discretionary income than the dual-income family of the early 2000s.  To keep pace, the recent trend has been for households to take on more and more debt to make up for this real short-fall:

household debt

Now this is an interesting point.  The balance sheet of Americans has taken a major hit since the recession started.  In fact, residential real estate values (the place where most have their net worth) have cratered by $6 trillion.  But look at the above.  The debt hasn’t adjusted.  This has to do with banks not realizing the actual losses (i.e., shadow inventory, etc).  Yet the reality is losses have occurred.  And when you even run hypothetical scenarios you can understand why having two incomes isn’t a big win:

dual income household trap

Source: CNN

This is an interesting perspective.  If you run through nearly each line item above, everything has gone up in price over this time.  Don’t even start with healthcare or college costs because the chart would tilt right over.  But even looking at mortgage payments and taxes, things have shifted.  Also, with the single income household you didn’t need two cars or needed to pay for daycare/babysitting.  These are added costs that come when per capita incomes have shrunk.

Now with many households becoming one income households yet again because of this recession, we see the tide rolling out and how bad things really are.  Combine this with a tightening of credit access and the reality is revealed.  Home values are still extremely expensive and have been covered up by dual income households and massive amounts of debt.  Remove both of those and you get a very ugly economic picture.

So what does this mean?  It means home values need to drop lower.  It also means we need to focus on figuring out what is needed to get our employment base on the right track.  We don’t need any more agents, brokers, or Wall Street i-bankers so we need to ask what industries we want to see flourish in this country.  The only pundits we hear from on national TV usually want the old order to come back.  Looking at the above data, that looks highly unlikely.

U.S. foreclosures fall but new delinquencies up
by Al Yoon - Reuters

The number of U.S. homes headed for foreclosure fell during the second quarter, marking the first such drop since the housing slump began in 2006, but the improvement may be fleeting as the number of newly delinquent homeowners rose, a banking group said on Wednesday. The percentage of loans in the foreclosure process declined last quarter to 4.57 percent from 4.63 percent in the first quarter, partly because of lender efforts to ease payments for homeowners and the impact of temporary home purchase tax credits, the Mortgage Bankers Association said in a report.

Foreclosures could head higher in coming months, however, as the percentage of borrowers at least one payment behind resumed its rise after easing late last year, the MBA said in a report that covers more than 85 percent of the market. The pipeline of delinquencies and huge rise in properties on balance sheets of financial institutions last quarter has aggravated concerns that the critically important housing sector will drag the U.S. economy back into recession.

Foreclosures have also taken a toll on consumer confidence and are steering buyers away from the market as they expect the supply to pressure prices still lower. The "shadow inventory" of homes likely headed to market is about 4.5 million, Michael Fratantoni, vice president for single-family research and policy development at the MBA, said on a conference call.

"On the surface, there is good news on the foreclosure front, but not on short-term delinquencies," said MBA Chief Economist Jay Brinkmann. "There's a little pause. It could be short-term factors instead of a trend." The number of loans 30 days past due, at 3.51 percent last quarter versus 3.45 percent in the first, show a correlation with the recent rise in unemployment benefit claims, he said.

Today's 'Good' Unemployment Data Mask A Huge Jump In Emergency Claims
by Vincent Fernand0 - Business Insider

Here's why today's jobless claims data wasn't quite as good as the headline number made it out to be. Yes, initial jobless claims for the week ending August 21st were 473,000, which was lower than consensus had forecast, and below the 500,000 level broken one week ago. Continuing unemployment claims also shrunk.


The latest report described a 200,000 jump in people seeking emergency unemployment extensions (Emergency Unemployment Compensation, EUC*), for the week ending August 7th, which is the latest data. As shown by a chart from Waverly Advisors below, emergency unemployment claims have shot up markedly as percentage of the workforce.

Waverly Advisors:

The number of claimants under all emergency extensions for the week ending August 7th expanded by 200k to 4.9 million. In context, the total receiving benefit extensions is now back over 3% of the civilian work force and at the highest level since April.

*Emergency Unemployment Compensation is provided as a temporary Federal extension for the unemployed who have already used up their regular state benefits.

chart of the day, claims under state programs, 2000-2010

Global outlook casts shadow over Fed’s annual Jackson Hole retreat
by Mark Felsenthal - Reuters

Central bankers from around the world will assess a darkening economic outlook at their annual U.S. mountain retreat this week with discussion of printing yet more money to spur growth on the agenda. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is likely to signal his views about the uncertain prospects for the world's biggest economy but probably won't offer many clues on whether the U.S. central bank will pump more cash to keep the recovery going.

Fears the U.S. economy was at risk of a new downturn were heightened on Wednesday by new economic data that showed in July single-family home sales slumped to the their slowest pace on record and factory orders fell by the most in 1-1/2 years. Other top central bankers will arrive at the Jackson Hole, Wyoming, resort with their own concerns.

European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet faces his own challenge of a two-tier recovery. While the euro zone economy as a whole has strengthened thanks to strong German growth, the ECB looks set to keep providing banks with unlimited funds at a fixed rate to help banks and governments in Europe's troubled periphery.

Bank of England and Bank of Japan officials will come to the Teton mountains likely to talk about how they might have to push more money into their economies to stimulate growth, a last resort when benchmark interest rates approach zero. Bank of Japan Governor Masaaki Shirakawa was due to leave Tokyo on Thursday for the Jackson Hole meeting, making it less likely the Bank of Japan would hold an emergency meeting in the next few days to ease monetary policy.

"It's not just the U.S. that stalled in June and July, it's the world economy that hit a wall over the summer months," said Ellen Zentner, a U.S. economist for Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ in New York. The likely mood of concern among the central bankers heading for the wilds of Wyoming contrasts with the optimism of a year ago, when debate at Jackson Hole focused on ways to wean economies off emergency support as they emerged from recession.

The discussions give the world's top central bankers a chance to thrash out the major challenges of the moment as well as hike on trails in the scenic national park. Past roundups have come at economic turning points: the start of the credit crisis in 2007, the days before Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008 and before the start of the recovery in 2009. Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans said on Tuesday that the risks of a double-dip U.S. recession have risen in the last six months. While he added he did not think that was the most likely scenario, he said high unemployment and a fractured housing sector would make the recovery a fragile one.

Eyes On Bernanke
Bernanke's speech on Friday will be a keystone of the three-day conference, which has chosen as its theme the challenges of the next decade. His audience will be listening keenly for clues about shorter-term support for the economy. The Fed said on August 10 it would buy Treasury bonds with proceeds of maturing securities in its massive portfolio. It had been letting its balance sheet shrink naturally, effectively removing some of its huge stimulus. "This wasn't the right time to send a signal that we would be allowing a tightening to take place as these securities rolled off our balance sheet," Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher told Fox Business Network on Tuesday.

The big question now is whether the Fed will start buying Treasury bonds more aggressively again to provide the U.S. economy with a new injection of cash. The Wall Street Journal said on Tuesday that more senior Fed officials than previously thought voiced concerns about or objections to the relatively modest move to use mortgage debt maturities to buy Treasuries at the August 10 meeting.

The reported split within the central bank's upper echelons suggested the Fed could stand pat after rebalancing its balance sheet and set a high bar for any further asset purchases. "Under these circumstances, it would be premature for Chairman Bernanke to provide a set of guideposts for future policy moves, as helpful as that would be for the markets and as much as we believe that additional easing will ultimately be needed," analysts at Goldman Sachs said in a note on Tuesday. "Instead, we expect him to concentrate on how the economy and the Fed have come to where they are now, with at best just a general sense of economic risks in the months ahead."

Senator Bennet Says We Have Nothing to Show For All of Our Debt
by Jack Minor - Greeley Gazette

Michael Bennet, D-Colo,at a town hall meeting in Greeley last Saturday, Aug 21 said we had nothing to show for the debt incurred by the stimulus package and other expenditures calling the recession  the worst since the Great Depression. The meeting began with former Greeley Mayor Tom Selders introducing Bennet by telling the audience that he was a former Republican who changed his affiliation to Democrat because of "disgust with what the other party was doing." He went on to say that he was a Republican right now because he "wanted to exercise my influence against a certain candidate."

During his introductory remarks, Bennet criticized partisanship and praised local politics where people "don’t scream at each other all the time, they just try to get things done." He then opened it up for questions for an hour. During the meeting, Bennet also downplayed his position as the incumbent saying, "I’m not a career politician; I’ve never run for office before." Showing his educational roots, he said the chances of a student graduating from college was 9 out of 100 and for a student in the 8th grade chances of being a proficient mathematician was 15 percent.

He also said part of the education problem is that the system of training and retaining teachers "belongs to a labor market that discriminated against women and said, 'you’ve got two choices, one is being a nurse and one is being a teacher, which is it going to be?" He said this caused women to take teaching jobs at salaries that were not competitive because they could not do anything else, and that while this is no longer the case he said, "We have not changed the proposition for our teachers which is why we lose 50 percent of them in the first five years of their careers."

Regarding spending during his time in office he said, "We have managed to acquire $13 trillion of debt on our balance sheet" and, "in my view we have nothing to show for it." Speaking of the debt, he said our debt almost equals the economy. Regarding the current job situation, Bennet said the situation has been dire for over a decade saying, "We have created no net new jobs in the United States since 1998" which were the last two years of the Clinton administration. Pointing to a slide showing budget expenditures, he said that currently 65 percent of the budget was for social security, Medicaid and Medicare expenditures and that we could not grow our way out of debt.

Regarding the expiration of the Bush tax cuts Bennet would not commit to a position on whether to extend them simply saying, "I hope we look at it comprehensively." When asked about a recent report showing that government employees make more than their private sector counterparts said, "This is a time when we need to restrain wages in the public sector." He said we need to make sure "our wages are not growing faster than inflation or faster than our growth." Bennet also received a question about whether he would support card check and declined to give a firm answer saying, "I have not been a sponsor of the employee free choice act and the bill as written will not come to the floor to a vote." He also said, "I believe strongly in the right of workers to collectively bargain and organize free from intimidation."

School board member Judy Kron asked a question about negative campaign ads and Bennet replied he wanted to keep the campaign positive but he would respond to ads he felt misrepresented his record. Following the meeting, a small aircraft flew over the location multiple times with the words "Stop Obama" written on the bottom of the wings.

"Enron Accounting" Has Bankrupted America: U.S. Deficit Really $202 Trillion, Kotlikoff Says
by Peter Gorenstein - Tech Ticker

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecasts the U.S. budget deficit will hit $1.3 trillion this year. An astronomical figure, to be sure, but that’s lower than was projected in March. It’s also less than last year’s record $1.41 trillion deficit, which was close to 10% of GDP. And that's the good news.

As the deficit grows so does the national debt, which is currently more than $13.3 trillion, according to official figures. But the situation is actually much, much worse, according to Boston University economics professor Laurence Kotlikoff. "Forget the official debt," he tells Aaron in this clip. The "real" deficit - including non-budgetary items like unfunded liabilities of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and the defense budget - is actually $202 trillion, the professor and author calculates; or 15 times the "official" numbers.

"Congress has engaged in Enron accounting," says Kotlikoff, who recently penned an op-ed for Bloomberg entitled: The U.S. Is Bankrupt and We Don't Even Know It. Yet, the debt market continues to have an insatiable appetite for U.S. Treasuries; heading into Monday's session, the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond (which moves in opposition to its price) was at its lowest level since April 2009.

Kotlikoff says that's because the market is focused on the "mole hill" of official debt. In time, the U.S. will have a major inflation problem to rival that of Germany's post World War I Weimar Republic, he predicts. "We have to think about the fact that unless the government gets its fiscal act in order we’re going to have the government printing lots and lots money to pay these enormous bills that are coming due over time."

America is in need of major reform of the health-care, retirement, tax and financial system, Kotlikoff continues. "We need (to perform) heart surgery on this economy, not putting on more band-aids which is what we’ve been doing."  Barring that, your hard-earned dollars will soon be worthless, he declares.

Retiree Ponzi Scheme Is $16 Trillion Short
by Laurence Kotlikoff - Bloomberg

Social Security just celebrated its 75th birthday. Love it or hate it, it has done its job and should retire. We need a new system, the Personal Security System, which retains Social Security’s best features, scraps the rest, and covers its costs. Social Security’s objective -- forcing people to save for retirement -- is legit. Otherwise millions of us would seek handouts in our old age.

But Social Security has also played a central role in the massive, six-decade Ponzi scheme known as U.S. fiscal policy, which transfers ever-larger sums from the young to the old. In so doing, Uncle Sam has assured successive young contributors that they would have their turn, in retirement, to get back much more than they put in. But all chain letters end, and the U.S.’s is now collapsing.

The letter’s last purchasers -- today’s and tomorrow’s youngsters -- face enormous increases in taxes and cuts in benefits. This fiscal child abuse, which will turn the American dream into a nightmare, is best summarized by the $202 trillion fiscal gap discussed in my last column. The gap is the present value difference between future federal spending and revenue. Closing this gap via taxes requires doubling every tax we pay, starting now. Such a policy would hurt younger people much more than older ones because wages constitute most of the tax base.

What about cutting defense instead? Sadly, there’s no room there. The defense budget’s 5 percent share of gross domestic product is historically low and is projected to decline to 3 percent by 2020. And the $202 trillion figure already incorporates this huge defense cut.

The 3-Year-Old Vote
Reducing current benefits, most of which go to the elderly, is another option. But such a policy is highly unlikely. The elderly vote and are well-organized, whereas 3-year-olds can neither vote, nor buy Congressmen. In contrast, cutting future benefits is politically feasible because it hits the young. And that’s where Congress is heading, starting with Social Security. The president’s fiscal commission will probably recommend raising Social Security’s full retirement age to 70 from 67, for those who are now younger than 45. This won’t change the ages at which future retirees can start collecting benefits. It will simply cut by one-fifth what they get.

Some political economists point to Social Security’s 2010 Trustees Report and say, "Leave it alone. The system won’t run short of cash until 2037." Unfortunately, the Trustees’ cash-flow accounting, like all such accounting, is arbitrary and misleading. In fact, Social Security is broke. Its fiscal gap, which the Trustees measure correctly, is $16 trillion. This gap is small compared with the U.S.’s overall $202 trillion shortfall, not because the Trustees treat Social Security’s $2.5 trillion trust fund as an asset (a questionable choice), but because they credit one-third of federal revenue to the program.

But dollars are dollars. If we re-label Social Security "payroll" taxes as "general revenue wage taxes," Social Security’s fiscal gap increases by $60 trillion, and the fiscal gap of all other government activities falls by $60 trillion, leaving the overall $202 trillion gap unchanged. Even by the Trustees’ measure, there’s a massive problem. Coming up with $16 trillion requires permanently raising revenue or cutting benefits by 26 percent, starting now. In other words, the program is 26 percent underfunded.

Hitting Young People
Now cutting benefits of new retirees by 20 percent, with an increase in the so-called full retirement age, starting 20 or so years from now isn’t the same as immediately cutting the benefits of all retirees by 26 percent. Hence, the fiscal commissioners will need to hit young people with an even bigger whammy if they really want to solve Social Security’s long-term woes.

Most likely, Washington will simply raise the retirement age and kick the can further down the road. This is what the Greenspan Commission did in 1983, knowing full well that by 2010 the system would be in even worse shape. I say, retire Social Security and replace it with a version that works. Do this by freezing the current system, paying today’s retirees their benefits, while paying workers only what they have accrued so far once they retire.

Next, have all workers contribute 8 percent of their pay to the new system, with half going to a personal account and half to an account of a spouse or legal partner. The federal government would make matching contributions for the poor, the disabled and the unemployed, permitting the system to be as progressive as desired. All contributions would be invested in a global, market- weighted index of stocks, bonds, and real estate. The government would do the investing at very low cost and guarantee that contributors’ account balances at retirement would equal at least what was contributed, adjusted for inflation.

Between ages 57 and 67, each worker’s balances would gradually be swapped for inflation-indexed annuities sold by the government. Those dying before 67 would bequeath their account balances to their heirs. While this plan has private accounts, Wall Street plays no role and makes no money. Additional contributions would be used to fund life- and disability-insurance pools.

Our nation is in terribly hot water. Business as usual is no answer. The only way to move ahead is to radically reform our retirement, tax, health-care and financial institutions to achieve much more for a lot less. The Personal Security System is a major step in that direction. It meets all the legitimate goals of Social Security without the system’s waste and penchant for robbing the young.

Pensions targeted for budget woes
by Hank Beckman - Chicago Sun-Times

Rick Lochner showed up at the Naperville Area Chamber of Commerce Illinois is Broke luncheon Monday to find out just how dire the state's budget crisis is. The president of RPC Leadership Associates and Literacy DuPage noted that there are different levels of being broke and wanted some context in which to put the factual data. After listening to two speakers outline the cold, hard facts, Lochner said he had his answer. "Very bad," he said of the situation. "Scary bad."

R. Eden Martin, president of the Civic Committee with the Commercial Club of Chicago, joined Abbott chairman and CEO Miles White in speaking before about 100 local business and government leaders at the Holiday Inn Select about the situation in which the state finds itself. "We are in the midst of the most severe financial crisis in recent memory," White said. Speaking of the report that the Illinois is Broke Committee recently completed, White said, "We found the state spending $3 for every $2 it took in."

And White stressed that the blame for the state's budget woes was largely due to a problem familiar to many taxpayers across the nation: public sector pension expenses. "They have not been funded appropriately for decades," he said. Martin said the cumulative Illinois pension and health care liability was approximately $130 billion.

Recent Naperville Sun articles on the issue pointed out that this year's debt alone is projected to be $14 to $15 billion. Martin noted that about $10 billion of the debt was in pension and heath care spending. With the $130 billion in pension liabilities and $50 billion in state assets, the total unfunded liability is in the area of about $80 billion. Or it could actually be worse, Martin noted. Some business scholars have claimed that, depending on which accounting method is employed, the real liability could be as high as $200 billion.

If those figures are not sobering enough, Martin said that when the group began studying the problem in 2006, it limited its investigation to the five pension funds that provided retirement for the state's retirees. So the figures don't include any unfunded liabilities from the city of Chicago or other municipalities throughout the state. Naperville's unfunded liabilities for its police and fire departments alone are about $101.5 million; or 24 percent of the property tax levy, according to the recent Sun stories.

And the problem is getting worse. According to the Pew Foundation, Illinois ranked last in pension funding in 2008, being only 54 percent funded. Since then, that number has slipped to 47 percent. Martin warned that the short-term consequences of the debt could mean squeezing out money spent on education and Medicaid. Long-term problems could include the state going bankrupt and "at least one pension fund will run out of funds in the next decade."

Martin acknowledged the responsibility of paying state retirees what is owed them contractually, but stressed that prospective benefits for the future would have to be scaled back, ideally by using a move toward the defined contribution systems so many in the private sector use for their employees. Martin stressed that the pension reform legislation that was passed in March 2010 did nothing to roll back any of the state's current liabilities.

State Rep. Darlene Senger, R-Naperville, said even if a legislator or group of legislators put together a viable reform bill, it wouldn't do any good if House Speaker Mike Madigan kept it from coming to the House floor for a vote. Martin stressed that his organization was not partisan. He believed there were "people on both sides of the aisle who see reality ... they need to hear from all of us." Martin also said he believed Madigan would allow a bill on the floor for a vote.

White referred to the coming election and said the issue of unfunded liabilities should be "the No. 1 issue that candidates have to address." State Rep. Michael Connelly, R-Lisle, approved of the straight talk on fiscal discipline, saying, "The era of state employees paying zero for their health care will come to an end." Stephanie Wiese of Edgewood Clinical Services worried about possible cuts to other areas of the budget, such as education and social spending. "What will we be able to do for the underprivileged?" she said.

The True National Debt
by Jim Quinn - Burning Platform/Zero Hedge

When I read Paul Krugman and the other Keynesian boneheads saying that our debt is not a problem, they quote figures about our debt of $13.3 trillion versus our GDP of $14.6 trillion not being so bad. That is only 91% of GDP. They point to World War II when our national debt reached 120% of GDP. They say everything worked out after that.

Well lets analyze that comparison for just a second. In 1945, Europe, Russia and Asia lay in ruins. The devastation was epic. The United States stood alone as the only unscathed country in the world. America became the manufacturer to the world. We rebuilt Europe and Asia. Our GDP soared, as our National Debt declined from $269 billion in 1946 to $255 billion in 1951, remaining below $300 billion until 1963.

Today our reported National Debt is $13.362 TRILLION. This is the first big lie. There are two entities named Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that happen to be 80% owned by the US government. Anyone who thinks these two companies can operate without the backing of the US Government are delusional. The US taxpayer is on the hook for these two disastrously run companies. Somehow, government accounting doesn’t require their debt to be considered the responsibility of the US taxpayer. This is a fraud, pure and simple. Their debt is our debt.

According to their latest 10Q filed in early August (links below), their debts are:
  • Fannie Mae: $3.257 Trillion
  • Freddie Mac: $2.345 Trillion

The true National Debt of the United States is $18.964 Trillion. Therefore, our debt as a percentage of GDP is really 130%. This is beyond the level reached during World War II. We are no longer the manufacturer to the world. We are the consumer to the world. The country adds $4 Billion per day to the National Debt. Our GDP is stagnanting with future growth no better than 2% being realistic.

Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart, after analyzing data over 200 years throughout the world, have concluded that once debt reaches 90% of GDP, a tipping point is reached. Crisis and collapse will ensue.

After looking at data from 44 countries spanning 200 years, they’ve concluded that at ratios of debt to GDP up to 90%, there’s not much correlation between government debt and economic growth. Above 90%, however, median economic growth rates fall by one percentage point and average economic growth rates fall by about four percentage points. That makes the 90% level a kind of make-or-break point for countries that are hoping to grow their way out of debt. If the government debt load climbs above 90% of GDP, economic growth slows so much that growth is no longer a viable solution to reducing that debt. Above the 90% level, governments serious about reducing their debt load have to increasingly rely on “solutions” such as reducing wages and depreciating their currencies, which might over time increase global economic competitiveness enough to give a boost to national economic growth. In the short to medium term, however, these “solutions” inflict real pain on the citizens of the countries since they reduce standards of living.

The U.S. is well beyond the tipping point. By the time Obama exits Washington DC in 2012, the ratio will be 140% of GDP. That is if the currency collapse doesn’t happen first.

US credit card debt drops to lowest level in 8 years
by Eileen A. J. Connelly - AP

The amount consumers owed on their credit cards in this year's second quarter dropped to the lowest level in more than eight years as cardholders continued to pay off balances in the uncertain economy. The average combined debt for bank-issued credit cards — like those with a MasterCard or Visa logo — fell to $4,951 in the three months ended June 30, down more than 13 percent from $5,719 in the same period a year ago, according to TransUnion. The credit reporting agency said it was the first three-month period during which card debt fell below $5,000 since the first quarter of 2002.

Credit card debt remained the highest in Alaska, but slid 7 percent there to $7,148. A total of 22 states recorded debt higher than the national average. Residents of Alabama paid off the most debt, dropping their average balance by 27 percent to $4,753. More borrowers also made payments on time. The rate of cardholders past due by 90 days or more fell to 0.92 percent in the second quarter, from 1.17 percent last year.

That's the first time the delinquency rate has been below 1 percent since the second quarter of 2007, before the recession, said Ezra Becker, director of consulting and strategy in TransUnion's financial services unit. The rate fluctuates during the year, he said, but the improvement is more evidence that consumers are working to make sure their credit cards remain in good standing. That concern reflects several economic factors, from the fear of unemployment to the fact that the collapsed housing market means it's harder to cash in on home equity when money gets tight. "You can't buy groceries with your house anymore," Becker said.

Reflecting the weak economies in the states hardest hit by the housing crisis, the delinquency rate was highest in Nevada, at 1.5 percent of cardholders, followed by Florida, 1.24 percent, Arizona, 1.11 percent and California, 1.08 percent. In all, 16 states fared worse than the national average for delinquencies. The lowest delinquency rates remained in North Dakota, at 0.54 percent, and South Dakota, at 0.55 percent. In a twist, Becker said the foreclosure crisis could be helping to improve the timeliness of credit card payments and lower balances. When people don't make mortgage payments, he suggested, they have a short-term cash boost.

"That can provide extra money to pay down credit cards," he said. Besides paying down debt, consumers are getting fewer new cards. Nationwide, the number of new accounts opened dropped almost 6.5 percent from last year. TransUnion predicts that the national delinquency rate will remain below 1 percent for the rest of the year. However, on the high end, the Nevada rate is forecast to edge up to 1.6 percent.

U.S. Financial System Still "Fundamentally Corrupt," Kotlikoff Says: Here's How to Fix It
by Aaron Task - Tech Ticker

We have a "fundamentally corrupt financial system" and the Dodd-Frank reform bill did nothing to change it, says Boston University economics professor Laurence Kotlikoff. "Relatively little has changed except there are going to be more federal regulators who are probably going to miss major problems."

At the core of the 2008 crisis was "the production and sale of trillions of fundamentally fraudulent securities," Kotlikoff says, suggesting all levels of society participated in the fraud -- including homeowners. At the center of it all were financial intermediaries (a.k.a. Wall Street) who packaged and sold "snake oil under the guise of proprietary information" to limit or eliminate disclosure, and enabled by corrupt rating agencies, regulators and elected officials, he says.

In the accompanying video, Kotlikoff explains how we can "make Wall Street safe for Main Street." In short, we should transform all financial companies with limited liability (banks, hedge funds, private equity firms and insurance companies alike) into mutual funds, which the professor describes as "little banks that have 100% capital requirements. " Notably, the big mutual fund companies survived the "financial earthquake" of 2008-09 when the rest of the financial system collapsed, Kotlikoff recalls.

In late 2009, Kotlikoff and Harvard's Niall Ferguson penned an op-ed for The FT describing a blueprint for how to take moral hazard out of banking. Citing a speech by Bank of England governor Mervyn King, Kotlikoff and Ferguson called for "limited purpose banking" (LPB), that would "limit banks to their legitimate purpose - financial intermediation and payment facilitation." Nine months later, Kotlikoff remains convinced this "very simple reform" remains a much better alternative than the financial reform bill hammered out in Washington - with plenty of influence from Wall Street lobbyists.

"We are rebuilding [the system] out of straw rather than out of brick," Kotlikoff says, suggesting his "LPB" proposal will ultimately be good for the economy and provide a model for the rest of the world. "If we have a safe, sound [financial] structure other countries will follow suit," he says.

Ilargi: What, are others beginning to notice this too?

Can We Please Be Honest About Fannie And Freddie? They Now Exist To Make Houses More Expensive
by Henry Blodget - Business Insider

As we noted yesterday, the raison d'etre of housing subsidizers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has changed radically in the past three years. Specifically, the purpose of these two agencies has gone from "making housing affordable" to "keeping houses expensive."

How so? The government is panicked about what will happen to the economy (and voters) if house prices decline further. By subsidizing mortgages through Fannie and Freddie, therefore, the government is now doing everything it can keep house prices as high as it can.

Never mind that house prices are still above their long-term average.

Never mind that most Americans did not buy houses during the bubble years, and that many of those who did have since sold or been foreclosed upon--so this subsidy is now hurting more Americans than it is helping. 

Never mind that tens of millions of Americans would love to buy a house right now but can't because house prices are still too expensive--in part because they're being propped up by tax credits and mortgage subsidies. 

Never mind that house sales have now plunged to a mid-1990s low, in part because many people are waiting for further price declines that are taking longer to arrive in part because Fannie and Freddie are keeping houses expensive.

Never mind that government subsidies have never been able to stop prices from eventually regressing back to and beyond fair value (just look at Japan--or any other bubble since the dawn of time).

Never mind that the ongoing subsidy is costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars a year.

Never mind that the subsidy is just yet another secret Wall Street bailout in disguise (by driving mortgage rates down, Fannie and Freddie are driving the value of mortgage bonds up--and thus fattening Wall Street earnings).

Never mind that, as long as Fannie and Freddie delay the inevitable return of house prices to fair value, they will also delay the clearing and healing process that this country must go through if it is to get back on solid economic footing again.

In a normal economy, when you borrow money, you have to pay it back. Being able to borrow $1 million at a subsidized rate for the same monthly price at which you could borrow $500,000 at a market rate makes houses more "affordable" only when viewed through the narrow lens of monthly payments.  Eventually, if you want to own your house outright, you'll have to come up with $1 million--which is $500,000 more than you will have to come up with if you only borrowed half that amount. 

By enabling people to borrow more money for the same monthly price, Fannie and Freddie are now artificially increasing house prices--at taxpayer expense.  And it's not surprising that that's what they're doing--because that's exactly what the government wants them to do. But let's at least be honest about that.  The taxpayer money pits known as Fannie and Freddie no longer exist to make houses more "affordable." They exist to make them more expensive.

Prepare For The Age Of "Financial Oppression"
by The Pragmatic Capitalist

There’s a colorful report going around this week out of Morgan Stanley that describes the global magnitude of the sovereign debt crisis and essentially concludes that haircuts are coming for bondholders. In other words, sovereign defaults are inevitable. They say this debt crisis is far from over:

The sovereign debt crisis is not European: it is global. And it is not over. The European sovereign debt crisis of spring 2010 was a misnomer in more ways than one: there was not one crisis but two. And it will continue well beyond 2010, in our view.

The first crisis was, and remains, an institutional crisis of the euro, caused by a flawed multilateral fiscal surveillance framework. Steps have been taken towards a correction of the flaws with a move from peer pressure to peer control of fiscal policy. This is reflected by the acceptance by the Greek, Spanish and Portuguese governments of fiscal measures largely dictated from Berlin and Brussels.

The second crisis was, and remains, a sovereign debt crisis: a crisis caused by sovereign balance sheets being overstretched, to the point where insolvency ceases to be merely possible and becomes plausible.

This crisis is not limited to the periphery of Europe. It is a global crisis and it is far from over. We take a high-level perspective on the state of government balance sheets and conclude that debt holders have to be prepared to enter an age of ‘financial oppression’.”

They expand on the argument by showing that debt/GDP can be misleading and that debt/revenue is a more accurate reflection of the current environments:


From this metric the United States is in far worse shape than any other country listed. The USA is even worse off than Greece. Unfortunately, there is no mention of monetary systems in the report and the analyst clearly ignores the fact that the EMU is a vastly different monetary system than that in the USA. I strongly disagree that the sovereign debt crisis is a global issue. It is primarily a European problem caused in large part by their flawed currency system. There is no default risk in the USA as I have explained before. What the United States suffers from is a massive private sector debt bubble that requires substantial de-leveraging. Where I agree with Morgan Stanley is that this crisis is far from over and that there should and will be haircuts (if only we’d allowed a few more haircuts here in the US banking system):

It is not whether to default, but how, and vis-à-vis whom. What this means is that – as indicated above – governments will impose a loss on some of their stakeholders and have in fact started to do so (across Europe at least). The question is not whether they will renege on their promises, but rather upon which of their promises they will renege, and what form this default will take. “

America's century is over, but it will fight on
by Larry Elliott - The Guardian

The structural problems of the US economy are too deepseated and intractable to be solved by regular doses of cheap money "This sucker's going down." That was George Bush's pithy description of the US economy when the financial crisis in the autumn of 2008 threatened to bring down every bank on Wall Street. Concerted international co-operation of a sort never seen before averted disaster that winter and by the middle of last year the world's biggest economy seemed to be on the mend. American factories started to hum again, shares rallied sharply and growth resumed. The US was showing its traditional resilience when faced with adversity and all was right with the world.

That judgment now appears premature. The latest economic data from the US has been poor. Traditionally, America's flexible labour market has meant job creation in the aftermath of recessions has been robust; this time it was weak even when output was growing strongly in late 2009 and 2010. Recently it has gone into reverse. The official unemployment rate in the US is 9.5% but the real level of joblessness is far higher after part-time workers who would prefer to have full-time jobs are taken into account. In a country with a less generous welfare system than that in Europe, unemployment acts as a brake on demand, making consumers save rather than spend.

That sense of caution has been reinforced by the state of the US property market, which is also going backwards after the expiry in the spring of tax breaks to buy homes. Those states that enjoyed the biggest boom in house prices during the bubble years are now caught in a vicious downward spiral where a crashing property market leads to higher unemployment, rising foreclosures and further downward pressure on house prices. Pressure on individual states to balance their budgets has made matters worse. Public sector workers are being laid off, leading to still higher unemployment and even lower house prices.

The risk of the US suffering a double-dip recession should come as no surprise given the profound nature of the shock provided by the seizure in financial markets two years ago. What happened then was that the flow of credit dried up as banks hoarded liquidity and became ultra-reluctant to lend. Central banks and finance ministries everywhere rightly concluded that there would be a repeat of the deflationary slump of the 1930s unless they flooded the global economy with money. So they slashed interest rates, cranked up the electronic printing presses and announced massive fiscal stimulus packages.

Money supply
This process has worked, but only up to a point. Excluding China, the annual growth rate in the global money supply has fallen from 10% at the height of the financial crisis to zero. Without the action taken by the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and other central banks there would have been a collapse of credit every bit as disastrous as that seen in the Great Depression. China's stringent capital controls meant most of the benefit from its monetary and fiscal stimulus was felt domestically.

Output rebounded quickly and strongly from the collapse in late 2008, and this in turn convinced investors that Asia could provide the engine for global growth while North America and Europe gradually recuperated. That explains why equity and commodity prices rebounded with alacrity from the spring of 2009 onwards, and why Germany – the world's main supplier of the machinery to power industrial development in the emerging world – enjoyed an export-led boom in recent months. But welcome as it was, China's emergency action was not cost-free. The economy lacked the capacity to cope with the sheer scale of the stimulus and showed signs of overheating. Policy has been tightened and China is now showing signs of slowing.

Stalling China
Provided China has a pause for breath rather than a sharp retrenchment there is still a chance that the global economy will muddle through. Factories in Germany and Japan will churn out manufactured goods for Asia, stock markets will take heart that a second leg to the global downturn has been avoided, and cheap money will start to stimulate demand growth in the US once consumers have built up their savings to a level they consider prudent.

But in the US, the Fed is starting to contemplate a much bleaker scenario in which the US and Chinese economies stall simultaneously, with knock-on effects on those countries (a vast number) seeking to export their way out of trouble. The fear, already reflected in global bonds markets, is of softer output, fresh trouble for the banks, and deflation. James Bullard, the president of the St Louis Federal Reserve Bank, noted last week that the US was closer to the deflation seen in Japan in the 1990s than it has been at any other time in its history.

This is a clear sign that the Fed is considering another dose of quantitative easing this autumn. It probably wouldn't take much more poor economic news to trigger it. The mid-term elections for Congress are looming and plenty of the Democrats elected on Obama's coattails two years ago are fretting about losing their seats in November. Ben Bernanke's speech at the annual symposium of central bankers in Jackson Hole on Friday will be scrutinised for hints that the Federal Reserve chairman might be preparing to live up to his nickname of "helicopter Ben" and spray the US economy with more money.

It would be a controversial move. Some would argue that the excesses of the bubble years have to be purged from the system and that any attempts to avoid the necessary adjustment merely prolongs the Great Reckoning and threatens a burst of inflation. Others believe that the problems of the US economy are too deep seated and intractable to be solved by regular doses of cheap money.

Giovanni Arrighi in his book The Long Twentieth Century argues that there have been four major phases of capitalist development since the Middle Ages, starting in Genoa and moving on to Holland and Britain before the start of American dominance during the Great Depression of 1873-96. It was during this period, Arrighi argues, that commerce started to play second fiddle in Britain to finance, just as it had in Genoa and Holland when their phases of pre-eminence were drawing to a close. The financialisation of the American economy in turn can be traced back to the mid-1970s, so by this interpretation of history, the dotcom collapse of 2000-01 and the financial crisis of 2007-08 (with the military entanglements in Iraq and Afghanistan sandwiched in between) are part of a much longer term development.

According to this thesis, the concentration of economic power on Wall Street, the stagnation of incomes for all but the rich, the structural trade deficit, the military overreach, the switch from being the world's biggest creditor nation to its biggest debtor add up to a simple conclusion: we are in the twilight years of the long American century.

Such a conclusion is contested in Washington but may help explain why, as Albert Edwards of Société Générale puts it: "Unprecedentedly strong monetary and fiscal stimulus has led to unprecedentedly weak recovery." This will worry Bernanke, who made his name explaining how policy makers could avoid repeating the mistakes made during Japan's lost decade and can anticipate the dire consequences of a period of deflation for a nation wallowing in debt. Despite rising commodity prices, core inflation in the US is low. The Fed still has levers to pull and if there is the remotest possibility of this sucker going down again, it will pull them.

Commercial Property Owners Choose to Default
by Kris Hudson and A.D. Pruitt - Wall Street Journal

Like homeowners walking away from mortgaged houses that plummeted in value, some of the largest commercial-property owners are defaulting on debts and surrendering buildings worth less than their loans. Companies such as Macerich Co., Vornado Realty Trust and Simon Property Group Inc. have recently stopped making mortgage payments to put pressure on lenders to restructure debts. In many cases they have walked away, sending keys to properties whose values had fallen far below the mortgage amounts, a process known as "jingle mail." These companies all have piles of cash to make the payments. They are simply opting to default because they believe it makes good business sense.

"We don't do this lightly," said Robert Taubman, chief executive of Taubman Centers Inc. The luxury-mall owner, with upscale properties such as the Beverly Center in Los Angeles, decided earlier this year to stop covering interest payments on its $135 million mortgage on the Pier Shops at Caesars in Atlantic City, N.J. Taubman, which estimates the mall is now worth only $52 million, gave it back to its mortgage holder. "Where it's fairly obvious that the gap is large, as it was with the Pier Shops, individual owners are making very tough decisions," he said.

These pragmatic decisions by companies to walk away from commercial mortgages come as a debate rages in the residential-real-estate world about "strategic defaults," when homeowners stop making loan payments even though they can afford them. Instead, they decide to default because the house is "underwater," meaning its value has fallen to a level less than its debt. Banking-industry officials and others have argued that homeowners have a moral obligation to pay their debts even when it seems to make good business sense to default. Individuals who walk away from their homes also face blemishes to their credit ratings and, in some states, creditors can sue them for the losses they suffer.

But in the business world, there is less of a stigma even though lenders, including individual investors, get stuck holding a depressed property in a down market. Indeed, investors are rewarding public companies for ditching profit-draining investments. Deutsche Bank AG's RREEF, which manages $56 billion in real-estate investments, now favors companies that jettison cash-draining properties with nonrecourse debt, loans that don't allow banks to hold landlords personally responsible if they default. The theory is that those companies fare better by diverting money to shareholders or more lucrative projects.

"To the extent that they give back assets or are able to rework the [mortgage] terms, it just accrues to the benefit" of the real-estate investment trust, says Jerry Ehlinger, RREEF's co-chief of real-estate securities. Earlier this month, a group led by investment firms Colony Capital relinquished control of the $2 billion Xanadu retail development in New Jersey to a bank group, blaming their creditors for balking at a restructuring. The lender group said it is "disappointed that despite its best efforts" it couldn't reach a deal.

More landlords are expected to follow suit. Of the $1.4 trillion of commercial-real-estate debt coming due by the end of 2014, roughly 52% is attached to properties that are underwater, according to debt-analysis company Trepp LLC. And as the economic recovery sputters, owners of struggling properties are realizing a big property-value rebound isn't imminent. Owners of commercial property have an easier time walking away than homeowners because commercial mortgages are typically nonrecourse. That means the biggest penalty for walking away is the forfeiture of assets and cash flow they may generate.

Whether landlords walk away from properties often depends on the lender. In recent years, most projects were financed by the use of commercial-mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, which are effectively bundles of mortgages sold as bonds to thousands of investors. Restructuring debt with scores of bondholders is more difficult than with banks. If borrowers do walk from bond-financed properties, the real estate is often foreclosed and sold for less than the loan balance. Investors holding those loans take another hit by paying fees to loan servicers that handle the liquidations.

Also, public and private real-estate companies don't often default on mortgages provided by banks because the same banks are likely to be providers of credit lines or other loans. Playing hardball with a bank on one loan could adversely affect the relationship and other loans. In one recent CMBS default, Vornado, one of the country's largest owners of offices and malls, stopped payments on an $18 million mortgage on the Cannery at Del Monte Square mixed-use development in San Francisco. Simon Property Group last year also walked away from the struggling Palm Beach Mall in West Palm Beach, Fla. And Macerich in July forfeited Dallas's Valley View Center mall, which was saddled with a $135 million mortgage.

Harris Trifon, head of research on commercial-real-estate debt for Deutsche Bank, says walkaways won't derail the nascent return of CMBS-financed properties. "But you have the potential for more pain for select groups of investors," he says.

Hard-nosed Fed sends global markets reeling
by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard - Telegraph

The global bond markets and the twin havens of the yen and Swiss franc have been flashing warning signs for weeks, tracking leading indicators as they topple like dominoes. They always sniff trouble first. Wall Street and Western bourses have until now brushed aside worries that recovery in the US, Japan and southern Europe may be stalling – as have commodity markets – betting the lords of finance will come to the rescue with more liquidity if needed.

Equity investors learned this week that they had misjudged the risk of a relapse as fiscal stimulus wears off, and misread the willingness of the US Federal Reserve to respond. Wrongly viewing Ben Bernanke's Fed as a soft touch, they took a fresh blast of quantitative easing for granted before it was agreed. What has emerged since the acrimonious Fed meeting on August 10 is that Bernanke was unable to marshal a consensus behind fresh QE. Seven members argued that Fed should not take such a drastic step until the economy was in serious trouble, according to Wall Street Journal Fed-watcher Jon Hilsenrath.

They settled on a compromise that the Fed should roll over holdings of bonds as they reach maturity to avoid passive tightening. But there was no deal on further action. Philadelphia's Charles Plosser grumbled that the Fed had sent "a garbled message". More ominously, some Fed officials fear the central bank is already "pushing on a string" and does not have the means to revive the economy. Whether or not they are right, this comes as a psychological shock for investors schooled by the "Greenspan Put' into thinking that there is a deus ex machina in the wings.

Market tensions have been simmering for days. They erupted on Tuesday when Japan's yen smashed through resistance against all major currencies, reaching a 15-year peak against the US dollar. The Nikkei index buckled below 9,000 as yen strength pushed Japan's export industry deeper under water. Yields on 10-year bonds fell to 0.92pc in Japan and record lows of 2.23pc in Germany and 2.88pc in the UK. They hit 2.47pc in the US, a Depression level. Irish spreads ballooned to the highest since the launch of EMU. Greek spreads neared 900 basis points, as if the EU's €110bn bail-out never happened.

"This has been one of the most interesting days in finance ever," said Andrew Roberts, head of credit at RBS. "We are right at the tipping point. Yields are about to collapse even further, equities are about to turn over. The end game approaches, probably in next few weeks." In the US, the 27pc collapse in existing homes sales in July leaves no doubt that America's property market cannot stand on its own feet without the prop of homebuyer tax credits. "Home sales are in free-fall. These are truly dismal numbers," said Teunis Brosens from ING.

The overhang of unsold homes has jumped from 8.9 months' supply to 12.5, higher than at any point during the Great Recession. Over 20pc of mortgage holders are already in negative equity and home default notices hit 325,000 in July. The Richmond Fed's manufacturing index showed a plunge in August expectations on Tuesday, with shipments dropping to 7 from 40 two months earlier, and the backlog of orders dropping to -1 from 22. This follows the Philly Fed's crash last week to -7.

Stephen Lewis from Monument Securities said bond yields have dropped further than they did in the "flight to safety" extreme of late 2008, a sign that markets fear that underlying conditions are even worse today than they thought then. "Now they fear the global economy will remain in the mire for decades," he said. For the Japanese this has become a nightmare. Their V-shaped rebound has been cut off short of its 2008 peak. Growth stalled to just 0.1pc in the second quarter. Unemployment has been rising for four months.

Yet it is their curse to have a currency that strengthens at the wrong time, pushing them deeper into deflation. The Japanese repatriate their foreign wealth in storms, driving up the yen. The dollar-yen rate hit ¥83.6 yesterday, prompting ever warnings from Toyko that intervention nears. Finance minister Yoshihiko Noda said the moves were "disorderly" and posed a threat to stability. "I am watching currencies with great interest," he said.

Goldman Sachs said the yen was now overvalued by 20pc, or two "standard deviations" out of kilter. It was even more over-valued against the dollar in the mid-1990s but that is scarcely relevant. Over 60pc of Japan's rebound in exports has been driven by Asia, and only 13pc by the US. What matters is the yen rate against China's yuan. That has reached a crucifying ¥12.4. The vice grips ever deeper.

Fed in Emergency Bid to Put Bailout Disclosure Ruling on Hold
by Reuters

The Federal Reserve asked a U.S. appeals court to delay implementing a ruling that would force the central bank to disclose details of its emergency lending programs to banks during the financial crisis. Wednesday's emergency request for a 90-day delay came after the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Aug. 20 denied a motion by the Fed to rehear the case, which had been brought by Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News, and News Corp's Fox News Network.

A stay would give the Fed and the Clearing House Association, a group of major U.S. and European banks, until Nov. 18 to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Fed programs were designed to shore up the financial markets, and more than doubled the central bank's balance sheet to well over $2 trillion, especially after the September 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings.

In March, the Second Circuit ordered the Fed to disclose information, including the names of bailout recipients and amounts received, that the news media had requested under the federal Freedom of Information Act. The Fed argued that allowing disclosure could stigmatize banks, causing a loss of confidence that could lead to deposit runs, bank failures and damage to the economy.

In its Wednesday filing, the Fed said denial of a stay would "force the government to let the cat out of the bag, without any effective way of recapturing it" if the Second Circuit ruling were later reversed. "The public policy interest identified by the government will be irreversibly lost," it added. Fed spokesman David Skidmore said "the stay is necessary to permit the board to consult with the Department of Justice regarding an appeal to the Supreme Court." The cases are Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System et al, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Nos. 09-4083, 09-4097.

Canadian Firm Makes Bold Bet on Falling Prices
by Gregory Zuckerman - Wall Street Journal

A Wager by Fairfax Financial Risks $174 Million. If Deflation Arrives, It Could Be Worth Billions.

A Canadian insurer is turning to a seldom-used strategy to make a big wager on falling prices over the next decade. As more investors worry about the possibility of deflation—or a sustained period of falling prices that could cripple stocks—Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd. has spent nearly $200 million to buy derivative contracts wagering on a decline in the consumer-price index, an inflation indicator. The trade could lead to huge profits if deflation occurs.

Fairfax purchased some of the derivative investments in the first three months of the year, when few fretted about deflation and the cost of the contracts was cheap. It added more in the second quarter. The derivatives now are catching the attention of some on Wall Street. They have gained more than 50% in value since Fairfax made its original purchases from a number of banks, generating paper profits of more than $100 million.

The Fairfax bet, which aims to protect $22 billion of Fairfax's investment portfolio, comes as investors grapple with a particularly challenging environment, with the economy fragile and stock indexes struggling. Few investors are willing to make big wagers on deflation, despite its potential, with many skeptical any deflationary period would last long. The U.S. hasn't experienced an extended bout of deflation since the Great Depression.

Still, Fairfax isn't selling its deflation protection, despite its recent run-up in value. It thinks bigger gains could be ahead if the U.S. experiences a painful bout of deflation. "We are extremely concerned about a double dip in the economy and about a deflationary environment," says Paul Rivett, chief operating officer for Fairfax's investing department. Derivative bets on inflation aren't new. Some companies and investors pay small premiums to buy inflation "caps" or "floors" that pay off if inflation rises above or falls below a certain level. Others buy derivatives betting on moves in economic indicators like the CPI, the inflation indicator that is now running at an annual rate of about 1%.

But interest is growing among some larger investors for deflation derivatives like those Fairfax bought. Today it would cost about $330 million to protect the same $22 billion, dealers say. Traders can sell these contracts to others in the "interdealer market," where banks trade with each other, something that was rare for such contracts six months ago. About $4.5 billion worth of these contracts have been trading each month in the interdealer market, up from $2.5 billion a month last year, according to traders.

Fairfax was founded in 1985 by Prem Watsa, who has made a series of acquisitions; its name derives from the phrase "fair, friendly acquisitions." Mr. Watsa's investments for Fairfax have led some to dub him Canada's Warren Buffett. But in the U.S., Fairfax also has drawn attention for heated battles with short sellers; it has claimed these bearish investors helped drive down the insurer's shares several years ago before they turned higher in 2006. Fairfax shares have soared to more than 400 Canadian dollars (US$377) a share from about C$100 four years ago.

The insurer has a solid track record anticipating bad economic times. In 2003, Fairfax bought credit derivatives wagering on weakness among lenders including Countrywide Financial, scoring several billion dollars of profits when the housing market cracked in 2007. Lately, the company has been studying bouts of deflation suffered in the U.S. and, more recently, in Japan, and it is getting worried. "People say they understand deflation, but they don't understand how corrosive it is," Mr. Rivett says.

The Fairfax team believes U.S. households have only begun reducing borrowing and increasing savings, a trend it expects will lead to less spending, higher unemployment and deflation. Fairfax paid $174 million in upfront fees to protect $22 billion of its investment portfolio against the possibility of deflation over the next decade. In exchange, Fairfax will receive a payment amounting to the drop in CPI below 2%—the level of inflation when Fairfax bought its contracts—multiplied by the $22 billion.

If deflation averages 2% annually over the next 10 years, Fairfax's contracts would rise in value the equivalent of 4% of $22 billion, or $880 million, each year over the next decade, according to traders familiar with Fairfax's trades. In that scenario, if Fairfax holds on to its investments during the 10-year period, it would reap nearly $9 billion from its $174 million investment. The company wouldn't get anything for its bet if inflation turns out to be higher than 2% over the next 10 years. Fairfax wouldn't comment on potential returns or how the trades were structured.

Some banks selling these derivatives say they are skeptical of deflation. Prices for the derivative insurance suggest a 20% chance of deflation over the next 10 years, traders say. The banks say they have hedged their exposure, or reduced their risk, by finding other investors skeptical of deflation to take the other side of the trades or by purchasing their own insurance. But traders say there are no perfect hedges when selling these derivatives. Some could be on the hook in the event of steep deflation.

Regulators Begin Process of Labeling the 'Systemically Important'
by Victoria McGrane And Damian Paletta - Wall Street Journal

The Dodd-Frank financial-regulation bill was sold as a way to prevent giant, octopus-like financial companies from ravaging the entire financial system if they fail. Now that it is law, regulators must decide which companies will be classified as "systemically important." Observers expect them to move quickly to put GE Capital and American International Group Inc. in that category.

The designation, and the consequences it carries, is a central plank in the law's attempt to end "too big to fail." The label aims to ensure that regulators closely watch certain companies, in hopes they quickly spot problems that could rock the entire financial system. It also seeks to discourage outsize growth by imposing stricter capital, liquidity and other restrictions on designated companies. Beyond AIG and GE Capital, the potential list of targets isn't clear. The decision falls to a new council of 10 regulators, led by the Treasury Department, which gained authority to tap firms as systemically important but has yet to offer real guidance as to what criteria will be used to define the term.

Companies can be designated based on their size as well as how "interconnected" they are with other large financial companies, an issue banks are likely to raise as they push for some of their competitors to face the same regulations they must follow. For banks, the designation is much simpler: Any bank holding company with more than $50 billion is automatically in the club. That threshold captures roughly 36 companies, according to government data.

Lobbyists for the banking industry plan to make sure regulators don't overlook their nonbank competitors that are engaged in comparable activities. "If they are in the sandbox, they ought to be playing by the same rules," said Mark Tenhundfeld, senior vice president for regulatory policy at the American Bankers Association. The "systemically important" issue is one of the central components of the new regulatory structure being assembled by the Obama administration. Administration officials argued that in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis, AIG was able to arbitrage the regulatory structure and pose a systemic risk to the economy without being properly regulated.

If seven of the 10 council members agree on a company's systemic importance, the company would face regulation by the Federal Reserve and strict new limits on its capital and borrowing, which could cost companies billions of dollars. The Fed's role in this decision-making process is crucial, because it has the ability to create a "safe harbor" set of qualifications that would essentially shield companies from the council's reach. But the Fed has given little hint as to how it might design this safe harbor.

Treasury officials have said that the council of regulators will hold its first meeting in September, though the exact date hasn't been set. The council has immediate authority to designate nonbank companies as systemically important, even before the new regulations the firms must meet are in place. The Fed has up to 18 months to issue the tougher regulations.

The financial trouble GE Capital experienced during the financial crisis helped make it something of a poster child for increasing regulatory oversight of certain nonbank companies, analysts say. The firm was one of the heaviest borrowers under the government's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, which allowed companies to issue government-backed debt. The Obama administration has long viewed it as an example of a company that escaped regulatory scrutiny because of its unique structure. "We will have to wait and see how the Council defines it and who they deem to be significant," said GE Capital spokesman Russell Wilkerson.

The uncertainty surrounding the designation has one major law firm advising nonbank financial clients that think they might be in the running for the label to track what information requests they get from the Office of Financial Research, created by the same legislation to act as the data collector and analyst for the council. Picking out those nonbank financial companies the council could tap has become a Washington parlor game—one in which the outcome carries potentially enormous implications and costs for the companies involved.

Broadly, firms that could be targeted include large life insurers as well as property and casualty insurers; asset-management companies; large hedge funds and private-equity funds; and the consumer-finance arms of the big commercial companies, including auto makers. Many companies, including asset managers, hedge funds, mutual funds, and insurance firms, believe they don't operate with the kind of "leverage," or risk, that banks use and therefore shouldn't be designated. Still, they are watching the process closely and many have already developed strategies to argue their case.

In financial-industry circles, some speculate that U.S. insurance giant Prudential Financial Inc. could get the designation. On paper, Prudential is similar in size and type of activities to MetLife Inc., another big insurance company. However, because MetLife owns the country's seventh largest bank holding company, controlling roughly $574 billion in assets, it would already face tougher scrutiny from the Fed. The similarity of the two insurers could mean regulators feel compelled to rope Prudential under the label as well. A spokesman for Prudential said it was "premature" to speculate about the systemic designation and declined to say whether the company had reached out to regulators on the issue.

Despite the speculation, it could be that that there just aren't that many firms that will qualify in the immediate future, said Concept Capital analyst Jaret Seiberg. Five years ago such a provision would have caused a huge stir, with markets wondering if firms like Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. or American Express Co. would qualify. Now, most of the major players have always been banks or have newly converted to bank charters, while the others went out of business, he said. "There are not a ton of mega-nonbank players left," Mr. Seiberg said.

California Delays $2.9 Billion School, County Payments Amid Budget Impasse
by Michael Marois - Bloomberg

California will delay paying $2.9 billion of subsidies to schools and counties in September, a month earlier than projected, to save cash amid an impasse that has left the state without a budget for 54 days. The state’s top financial officials -- the controller, treasurer and finance director -- told lawmakers today that the 90-day deferrals need to start next month instead of October to make sure there’s enough money to pay bondholders. The amount is in addition to $3.2 billion the state pushed back in July.

California began its fiscal year on July 1 without a spending plan after Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Democrats who lead the Legislature remained deadlocked over how to fill a $19 billion deficit. Controller John Chiang has warned he may need to issue IOUs within two weeks to pay for everything from supplies to contracted services and health-care costs if the impasse continues into next month.

"This is the salt in the wound," said Rick Pratt, assistant executive director of the West Sacramento-based California School Boards Association, which represents districts statewide. "It’s the state taking its cash flow problem and making it a school district problem," he said. He said deferrals from previous years have raised costs while the state has cut aid. The deferrals will help the state meet four major payments in October that total about $1.74 billion, according to H.D. Palmer, a spokesman for Schwarzenegger’s budget office. He said that includes about $803 million in interest on general- obligation bonds.

Budget Forces Move
"Without an enacted budget in the near term that provides an adequate solution on both a budgetary and cash-flow basis, remaining general-fund resources must be conserved to the greatest-possible extent to meet priority payments, particularly all debt-service obligations," the state’s top three finance officials said in a letter sent to lawmakers. Absent a budget, the state can’t sell the short-term notes it typically uses each year to bridge cash shortages, because an approved spending plan must provide for repayment of the debt.

Investors today were demanding about 112 basis points of extra yield on the state’s 10-year bonds above those of AAA rated municipal securities, a three-month low, according to Bloomberg Fair Value Index data. That’s less than the 171 basis- point spread the bonds reached on July 1, 2009, just before the state began issuing IOUs amid a similar budget standoff. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

Downgrade Looms
Standard & Poor’s, which gives the state its fourth-lowest investment-grade rating of A-, said June 8 that if the current impasse extends for as long as three or four months, it may lower that score. California had $69 billion of outstanding general-obligation debt as of May 1, S&P said. Another $41.6 billion in tax-backed debt issues has been authorized, according to Treasurer Bill Lockyer’s website.

The payment deferral was announced as lawmakers passed a bill to let recipients use state IOUs to pay fees and taxes owed to the government in Sacramento, if the warrants are issued. The legislation, from Assemblyman Joel Anderson, a San Diego Republican, passed the Senate unanimously. It requires all state agencies to accept registered warrants issued to pay for goods and services. The Assembly unanimously approved the measure in September.

Offsetting Hardship
The bill aims to offset the hardship IOUs can impose on those who receive them, Anderson said, citing the experiences some recipients had with last year’s warrants. The most-likely beneficiaries would be vendors who get IOUs for goods and services rendered and must make periodic payroll-tax payments to the state, said Collin McGlashen, a spokesman for Anderson. The state, with the world’s eighth-largest economy, issued $2.6 billion of IOUs last year after a similar budget stalemate. That was only the second time since the Great Depression that California had to use warrants to cover costs and conserve cash. Warrants issued last year paid 3.75 percent in interest, a rate set by the state’s Pooled Money Investment Board.

The largest banks operating in California, including Bank of America Corp., based in Charlotte, North Carolina, and JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York, last year agreed to swap cash for the IOUs for account holders in early July. Some banks stopped accepting them less than two weeks later. That left some recipients with the paper until redemptions began in September.

"It’s about equity," said Senator Tony Strickland, a Santa Barbara County Republican who is running for Controller against Chiang, a Democrat Schwarzenegger’s budget office opposes the IOU bill because it may reduce the state’s cash position to less than projected, said Palmer, the spokesman. Draining the state’s coffers would defeat the purpose of the warrants, he said. Budgets and tax increases in California must be approved by a two-thirds supermajority of the Legislature. While Democrats control both chambers, they are short of a two-thirds majority by two votes in the state Senate and five in the Assembly.

Nevada Assembly GOP leader: consider tax on food

The Republican minority leader in the Nevada Assembly suggests voters be asked to impose a statewide sales tax on food to help fill a swelling budget deficit. Assemblyman Pete Goicoechea (Goh-gah-CHEE-ya) of Eureka said Monday on KRNV-TV's Nevada Newsmakers that he believes a proposed 2% tax on food sales should have been put to voters this fall. Tax on food not intended for immediate consumption is banned by the state constitution. Changing the constitution requires a measure be passed by voters in two successive general elections. Nevada is facing a projected $3 billion deficit for the 2-year budget cycle that begins July 1.

Ontario's debt hits record $212 billion; 2009-10 deficit $19.3 billion

Ontario's deficit came in substantially less than forecast but the province's debt is now at a record $212 billion, a figure that had the opposition crying foul Monday. The Liberal government racked up a deficit of $19.3 billion in 2009-10, $2 billion less than forecast in the March budget. Still, public accounts released Monday show the province's debt grew by $35 billion to $212.1 billion, with the increase going mainly to financing the deficit. Ontario's debt was $138.8 billion in 2003-04, the first full year in office for the Liberals.

Despite the red ink, Finance Minister Dwight Duncan cast the lower-than-expected deficit figure as a positive indicator for the future. "Our deficit-to-GDP ratios and our deficit-to-revenue ratios are so much better than most of the western world, (which) I think is a good sign," Duncan said after the public accounts were released. "We've laid out an eight-year plan to balance the budget ... and this actually puts us in a solid position moving forward."

The opposition parties were not as impressed with the economic performance of the Liberal government. "This deficit is putting us very close as we move forward for this government to double the cumulated debt in their term of office," said Progressive Conservative critic Garfield Dunlop. "I don't really think that's good news for the citizens of the province of Ontario." The New Democrats said Duncan shouldn't be taking credit for the lower-than-forecast deficit figure.

"I mean he's cut back money to hospitals, he's cut back money to people on welfare with the special diet allowance, and the Big Three auto companies have paid back some of the loan that I don't think he was planning on getting," said NDP critic Michael Prue. "I don't think it's anything he did."

The Canadian Taxpayers' Federation said people in Ontario should be worried the Liberals will use their financial problems to increase taxes yet again. "We haven't seen any movement from the McGuinty government on the (spending) reduction side, just on the tax hike side," said federation director Kevin Gaudet. The public accounts report from the Ministry of Finance said tax revenues were $6.4 billion below budget forecasts in 2009-10, reflecting the lagging impact of the recession and a weaker-than-expected economic performance.

The 2010 budget set out a timetable to eliminate the red ink and return Ontario to balanced books by 2017-18, and Duncan said he couldn't talk about moving up that timeline despite the fact last year's deficit was $2 billion under forecast. "I've not got solid numbers upon which I can make those predictions right now and frankly, having been finance minister throughout 2008 and 2009 I've learned, perhaps better than most, how volatile revenues can be," he said.

"Remember, we had a 48 per cent decline in corporate tax revenues in one year." Ontario's real gross domestic product shrank by 3 per cent in 2009, while total provincial expenses for the year were $115.1 billion, just slightly below budget predictions.

German budget deficit jumps to 3.5% in 1st half 2010
by David Rising - AP

Germany's deficit rose sharply to 3.5 percent of economic output in the first half of 2010, putting it on track to break EU budget rules due to the costs of the global economic and financial crisis, official data showed Tuesday. Net borrowing for the first six months of the year came in at euro42.8 billion ($54.37 billion) — more than double the euro18.7 billion a year earlier, the Federal Statistical Office said. In 2009, the agency had reported a much smaller first-half deficit of 1.5 percent.

At the current rate, Germany will this year overshoot the European Union limit for budget deficits to be no more than 3 percent of gross domestic product. Officials in July said the country expects this year's deficit to come in at 4.5 percent of GDP but that it would be back under the 3 percent mark by 2012. Though the country has returned to growth after the economy shrank by a painful 4.9 percent last year — easily the worst performance since World War II — it continues to feel the effects of the global downturn.

"With some time lag, the impact of the economic and financial crisis and of the relevant government measures taken to support the economy and the financial markets is clearly reflected now in the budgets of the central, state and local government as well as the social security funds," the Wiesbaden-based statistical office said in a statement.

Still, the recovery has come more quickly than anticipated, and the Finance Ministry has said it expects the deficit to fall to 2 percent by 2013. The statistical office on Tuesday also confirmed preliminary numbers released earlier in August showing the economy surged ahead with 2.2 percent growth in the second quarter — the fastest pace for at least two decades. "The economic dynamic shows that the confidence of consumers and investors has returned," said Economy Minister Rainer Bruederle.

Unicredit economist Alexander Koch said an "imminent slowdown" of the global economy will lead to weaker exports for Germany but that the economy still looked on pace for 3.5 percent growth in 2010. "Even if the extent of the moderation in the growth dynamic is exceptionally uncertain, considering the latest still very expansionary business activity readings, the broad-based upswing of the German economy is likely to continue at a still decent pace in the short term," he said in a research note.

It pays to riot in Europe
by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard - Telegraph

Ireland must now pay more than Greece to borrow. Dublin has played by the book. It has taken pre-emptive steps to please the markets and the EU. It has done an IMF job without the IMF. Indeed, is has gone further than the IMF would have dared to go. It has imposed draconian austerity measures. The solidarity of the country has been remarkable. There have no riots, and no terrorist threats.

Yet as of today it is paying 5.48pc to borrow for ten years, or near 8pc in real terms once deflation is factored in. This is crippling and puts the country on an unsustainable debt trajectory if it lasts for long. Yet Greece is able to borrow from the EU at 5pc and from the IMF at a staggered rate far below that (still too high for the policy to work, but that is another matter). These were the terms of the €110bn joint bail-out. To add insult to injury Ireland is having to SUBSIDIZE Greece to meet its share of the rescue fund.

I am sure you can all see the absurdity of this. It has moral hazard written all over it, and shows what happens once a dysfunctional system twists itself into ever greater knots rather confronting the core issue. Yes, I know that the Irish and Greek maturities are different but the fact is that Greece has extracted better terms by letting matters get further out of hand.

George Papandreou’s PASOK has benefitted from dilly-dallying on the first set of austerity measures, and – not to be too diplomatic about it – by insulting the Germans with demands for war reparations. Hotheads also set fire to downtown Athens and Thessaloniki, improving the effect. If I were Irish – (and I suppose in a sense I am: Sir John Parnell was my great, great, great grandfather) – I would be a little annoyed.

Ireland downgrade further roils foreign exchange markets
by William L. Watts and Sue Chang - MarketWatch

A downgrade of Ireland's sovereign debt rating late Tuesday further roiled foreign exchange markets already agitated by dismal U.S. housing sales. One euro bought $1.2634 in recent trading, down from $1.2668 earlier in the day, and $1.2684 late Monday. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services downgraded Ireland's credit rating late Tuesday on concerns about the cost of bailing out the country's ailing banks. See Ireland sovereign debt downgraded.

Earlier in the session, the Japanese yen reached multiyear highs against the U.S. dollar, after data showed that existing U.S. homes sales in July fell by more than 27%. Fears the U.S. and global economic recovery could falter have contributed to safe-haven flows into the yen, the U.S. dollar and government bonds as investors unload stocks and other assets perceived as risky. U.S. stocks fell in Tuesday trading on Wall Street amid concerns over economic weakness and following the housing data.

The dollar fell to ¥83.57 in the U.S. session, a 15-year low, before recovering to ¥84.07 late Tuesday. In recent trading the dollar hit ¥84.20. The yen's early rally was supported by a news conference held by Japanese Finance Minister Yoshihiko Noda, whose efforts to talk down the Japanese currency by warning that the yen's strength could create economic instability backfired when he declined to specifically comment on the possibility of Japanese intervention in the foreign-exchange market. Traders took the remarks as a green light to dump the dollar and the euro against the yen, strategists said.

"For now, the yen remains a victim of U.S. economic weakness and the ever-narrowing compression between U.S. Treasury and Japanese government bond spreads," said Boris Schlossberg, director of currency research at GFT. "If risk-aversion flows accelerate into September, dollar/yen will continue to drift lower irrespective of any policy moves from Tokyo." The dollar index a measure of the U.S. unit against a basket of rival currencies, took a tumble after the housing data but recovered to 83.31 at last check, up from 83.117 late Monday.

The U.S. housing market numbers surprised the market, which had expected a fall in existing-home sales of 11%. "U.S. existing home sales completed a trifecta of negative data this morning from North America, following worse than expected Canadian retail sales and Mexican trade figures. The data disappointment fed into the overnight selloff in global bourses, boosting the attraction of safe-haven currencies," Michael Woolfolk, a senior currency strategist at BNY Mellon, wrote in a report.

Pound hit
The British pound was under pressure after Martin Weale, a member of the Bank of England's committee setting policy on interest rates, warned in a newspaper interview that Britain runs the risk of slipping back into recession. Weale, the newest member of the committee, told The Times of London that it would be "foolish" to rule out the possibility of a double-dip recession. The pound last traded at $1.5412.

"In policy terms, this reinforces what we knew already -- that the [Monetary Policy Committee] has a bias to maintain a very dovish stance for a very long time," said Kit Juckes, chief currency strategist at Societe Generale. "For sterling, this was the kind of article to help tip [British pound/U.S. dollar] over the same cliff-edge as euro/dollar. With technical levels broken, the downside beckons and the bears will be vocal," he said. The euro fell to a nine-year low against the yen, falling to ¥105.41 and changed hands in recent action at ¥106.45.

Concerns about deflation in the U.S. economy have helped push two-year Treasury yields to record lows, narrowing the spread over comparable Japanese bonds and making the dollar less attractive versus the Japanese currency. Finance Minister Noda strengthened his comments somewhat, telling reporters he would "act appropriately" and in line with the Group of Seven's foreign-exchange principles after being informed that the yen had hit a new 15-year high against the dollar, Dow Jones Newswires reported.

The G-7 has previously warned against excess volatility and disorderly movements in currency markets. Strategists, however, say it is unlikely Japan would be able to convince U.S. or euro-zone authorities to join in any coordinated intervention effort. They are also doubtful whether Japanese authorities are prepared to go it alone on intervention.

Ireland's NAMA to 'recover just €16 billion out of €40 billion spend on banks' bad loans'
by Emmet Oliver - Irish Independent

NAMA will only recover €16bn for the taxpayer on the €40bn it intends to spend on risky property loans from the banks, Standard & Poor's (S&P) has estimated. The agency, which downgraded Ireland's credit rating on Tuesday, said that only €16bn (equal to 10pc of GDP) would be recovered based on information it had seen. It didn't elaborate any further. The Government, on the other hand, hopes to make a full recovery of the entire amount.

S&P, which competes with agencies Fitch and Moody's, said the €16bn would be recovered "over the timeframe that our ratings address". The Irish Independent established yesterday that this was a reference to a five-year period. The National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) strongly disputed the S&P claims yesterday, saying the agency was effectively declaring NAMA assets to be worthless. But the agency makes it clear this is not the case. Instead it is worried about the ability of NAMA to turn its assets into hard cash in a short space of time.

"In our view, the loans that NAMA is acquiring have limited liquidity and cannot readily be sold in the near term,'' S&P said. Referring to the first batch of loans NAMA has taken over, S&P added: "We view these loans as having value, and as recoveries occur in the medium term we expect them to be available to pay down general government debt."

The NTMA and the agency seem to differ over when Ireland should be given credit for taking over the assets. S&P said that when sales actually take place "we may revise our ... estimates of Ireland's gross and net general government debt". But the Government, the EU and the statistics agency, Eurostat, take a different view, allowing the Government to move NAMA and associated debt completely off the balance sheet. Instead of becoming a direct liability, it becomes a contingent liability, making the net debt figures for the country look better.

But S&P has a different approach and made it clear yesterday this method was also being applied to other countries, like Spain and Cyprus. "We deduct only those assets which we believe to be equivalent to cash," said the agency. This emphasis on liquid assets, as opposed to harder-to-value property assets, was the main cause of disagreement between the NTMA and the agency yesterday.

S&P believes the ultimate haircut on NAMA assets will be 46pc, as opposed to its previous estimate of 45pc. It also thinks Ireland will have to borrow about €40bn to buy NAMA assets, as opposed to €43bn. "We have adjusted this amount to take account of the fact that 5pc of NAMA's payment to the banks is intended to be in subordinated debt that has no recourse to the Government,'' it adds.

"NAMA's own business plan applies a discount of 50pc on the nominal amount of loans it expects to be transferred from the bank,'' S&P pointed out. NAMA is currently working on moving its third tranche of loans out of the banks. The deadline is next February, when the EU has demanded that the process be completed.

Fresh flight to Swiss franc as Europe's bond strains return
by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard - Telegraph

The Swiss franc has surged to an all-time high against the euro on capital flight from the eurozone after Irish, Greek, and Portuguese bonds came under renewed fire. Yields on 10-year Swiss bonds fell to 1.02pc as investors flocked into the ultimate safe-haven asset, now outperforming gold. No country in the developed world apart form Japan has ever seen 10-year yields drop below 1pc. Rates remained significantly higher during the two great depressions of the 1870s and the 1930s.
Within the eurozone investors turned to German Bunds, pushing yields to an historical low of 2.11pc. The search for safety seems driven by swirling mix of fears over a double-dip recession in the US, austerity overkill across the West, and sovereign debt worries on the eurozone periphery. The Swiss National Bank appears to have abandoned efforts to halt the appreciation of the `Swissie’ after losing 14bn francs (£9bn) over the first half of the year in a failed effort to stop money flooding into the country, some of it coming from German citizens in Bavaria opening precautionary accounts.

The franc punched through €1.30 on news that Standard & Poor’s had downgraded Ireland to AA-. The rating agency cited concerns that the bank rescue costs may ultimately balloon to €50bn, against government estimates of nearer €25bn. S&P said the public debt would rise to 113pc of GDP if the bail-out fund is included on budget books. Effects of the downgrade ricocheted through the bonds markets of weaker economies. Spreads on Greek bonds rose 40 basis points to 927, higher than before the EU’s €110bn rescue.

Hans Redeker, currency chief at BNP Paribas, said flows into Swiss franc have been early warning signal at each stage of Europe’s debt crisis and should be watched closely. "We may be seeing a rerun of what happened in May," he said. Phil Jordan from Monument Securites said that even Britain was emerging as a sanctuary as yields fall to a fresh low of 2.84pc, though in this case the money is rotating away from the US. "Clients are selling US Treasuries to buy Gilts. The US economic data has been so bad investors are looking for other safe havens," he said.

Morgan Stanley said investors are taking a risk buying sovereign bonds at this level, arguing that debt-to-GDP ratios in the developed world greatly understate the true liabilities and aging costs that threat public finances. "It’s not whether governments will default, but how, and vis-a-vis whom," said Arnaud Mares in a client report. There have been plenty of episodes in history where governments use "financial repression" to wriggle out of debts, including Franklin Roosevelt’s revocation of gold clauses in US bond contracts in 1934, and Chancellor Hugh Dalton’s perpetual debt issue at an artificially-low 2.5pc in 1946. As a rule of thumb, countries with a high stock debt opt for stealth inflation, while those facing a financing crunch rewrite the contracts.

Mr Mares said most Western states are in "deep negative equity" and cannot hope to pay their debts. Bondholders have so far been "fully sheltered from loss" through the crisis but this is politically untenable. The rest of society will not suffer austerity for ever to pay the coupons. The next phase of the crisis will see revenge by all those who have already taken a big hit, or expect to do so: whether under water on their mortgages, unemployed, dependent on health support, or state employees. Democracy will have its way.

10 Practical Steps That You Can Take To Insulate Yourself (At Least Somewhat) From The Coming Economic Collapse
by Michael Snyder - Economic Collapse

Most Americans are still operating under the delusion that this "recession" will end and that the "good times" will return soon, but a growing minority of Americans are starting to realize that things are fundamentally changing and that they better start preparing for what is ahead. These "preppers" come from all over the political spectrum and from every age group.  More than at any other time in modern history, the American people lack faith in the U.S. economic system.  

In dozens of previous columns, I have detailed the horrific economic problems that we are now facing in excruciating detail.  Many readers have started to complain that all I do is "scare" people and that I don't provide any practical solutions.  Well, not everyone can move to Montana and start a llama farm, but hopefully this article will give people some practical steps that they can take to insulate themselves (at least to an extent) from the coming economic collapse. 

But before I get into what people need to do, let's take a minute to understand just how bad things are getting out there.  The economic numbers in the headlines go up and down and it can all be very confusing to most Americans. 

However, there are two long-term trends that are very clear and that anyone can understand....

#1) The United States is getting poorer and is bleeding jobs every single month.

#2) The United States is getting into more debt every single month.

When you mention the trade deficit, most Americans roll their eyes and stop listening.  But that is a huge mistake, because the trade deficit is absolutely central to our problems.

Every single month, Americans buy far, far more from the rest of the world than they buy from us.  Every single month tens of billions of dollars more goes out of the country than comes into it. 

That means that every single month the United States is getting poorer.

The excess goods and services that we buy from the rest of the world get "consumed" and the rest of the world ends up with more money than when they started.

Each year, hundreds of billions of dollars leave the United States and don't return.  The transfer of wealth that this represents is astounding.

But not only are we bleeding wealth, we are also bleeding jobs every single month.

The millions of jobs that the U.S. economy is losing to China, India and dozens of third world nations are not going to come back.  Middle class Americans have been placed in direct competition for jobs with workers on the other side of the world who are more than happy to work for little more than slave labor wages.  Until this changes the U.S. economy is going to continue to hemorrhage jobs.

The U.S. government has helped to mask much of this economic bleeding by unprecedented amounts of government spending and debt, but now the U.S. national debt exceeds 13 trillion dollars and is getting worse every single month.  Not only that, but state and local governments all over America are getting into ridiculous amounts of debt.

So, what we have got is a country that gets poorer every single month and loses jobs to other countries every single month and that has accumulated the biggest mountain of debt in the history of the world which also gets worse every single month.

Needless to say, this cannot last indefinitely.  Eventually the whole thing is just going to collapse like a house of cards.

So what can we each individually do to somewhat insulate ourselves from the economic problems that are coming?....   

1 - Get Out Of Debt: The old saying, "the borrower is the servant of the lender", is so incredibly true.  The key to insulating yourself from an economic meltdown is to become as independent as possible, and as long as you are in debt, you simply are not independent.  You don't want a horde of creditors chasing after you when things really start to get bad out there. 

2 - Find New Sources Of Income: In 2010, there simply is not such a thing as job security.  If you are dependent on a job ("just over broke") for 100% of your income, you are in a very bad position.  There are thousands of different ways to make extra money.  What you don't want to do is to have all of your eggs in one basket.  One day when the economy melts down and you are out of a job are you going to be destitute or are you going to be okay?

3 - Reduce Your Expenses: Many Americans have left the rat race and have found ways to live on half or even on a quarter of what they were making previously.  It is possible - if you are willing to reduce your expenses.  In the future times are going to be tougher, so learn to start living with less today.

4 - Learn To Grow Your Own Food: Today the vast majority of Americans are completely dependent on being able to run down to the supermarket or to the local Wal-Mart to buy food.  But what happens when the U.S. dollar declines dramatically in value and it costs ten bucks to buy a loaf of bread?  If you learn to grow your own food (even if is just a small garden) you will be insulating yourself against rising food prices.

5 - Make Sure You Have A Reliable Water Supply: Water shortages are popping up all over the globe.  Water is quickly becoming one of the "hottest" commodities out there.  Even in the United States, water shortages have been making headline news recently.  As we move into the future, it will be imperative for you and your family to have a reliable source of water.  Some Americans have learned to collect rainwater and many others are using advanced technology such as atmospheric water generators to provide water for their families.  But whatever you do, make sure that you are not caught without a decent source of water in the years ahead. 

6 - Buy Land: This is a tough one, because prices are still quite high.  However, as we have written previously, home prices are going to be declining over the coming months, and eventually there are going to be some really great deals out there.  The truth is that you don't want to wait too long either, because once Helicopter Ben Bernanke's inflationary policies totally tank the value of the U.S. dollar, the price of everything (including land) is going to go sky high.  If you are able to buy land when prices are low, that is going to insulate you a great deal from the rising housing costs that will occur when the U.S dollar does totally go into the tank.

7 - Get Off The Grid: An increasing number of Americans are going "off the grid".  Essentially what that means is that they are attempting to operate independently of the utility companies.  In particular, going "off the grid" will enable you to insulate yourself from the rapidly rising energy prices that we are going to see in the future.  If you are able to produce energy for your own home, you won't be freaking out like your neighbors are when electricity prices triple someday.

8 - Store Non-Perishable Supplies: Non-perishable supplies are one investment that is sure to go up in value.  Not that you would resell them.  You store up non-perishable supplies because you are going to need them someday.  So why not stock up on the things that you are going to need now before they double or triple in price in the future?  Your money is not ever going to stretch any farther than it does right now. 

9 - Develop Stronger Relationships: Americans have become very insular creatures.  We act like we don't need anyone or anything.  But the truth is that as the economy melts down we are going to need each other.  It is those that are developing strong relationships with family and friends right now that will be able to depend on them when times get hard.

10 - Get Educated And Stay Flexible: When times are stable, it is not that important to be informed because things pretty much stay the same.  However, when things are rapidly changing it is imperative to get educated and to stay informed so that you will know what to do.  The times ahead are going to require us all to be very flexible, and it is those who are willing to adapt that will do the best when things get tough.

WWIII ahead: Warfare defining human life by 2020
by Paul B. Farrell - MarketWatch

World War III is coming. Iraq and Afghanistan? Just warm-up acts. Foreign-policy blunders with huge economic consequences: Massive domestic debt handicapping future generations. But still just warm-up acts.
The main event: WWIII will engulf America in a "New Age of Warfare" with trillions and trillions and trillions of new debt, year after year after year. Yet we're silent, in denial. Nobody's talking about all this new debt ahead.

World War III: The Pentagon warns of "the mother of all national security issues ... By 2020 there is little doubt something drastic is happening," military officials told Fortune. "As the planet's carrying capacity shrinks, an ancient pattern of desperate, all-out wars over food, water, and energy supplies would emerge ... warfare is defining human life." This is a real game-changer, a paradigm shift, a turning point in human history, altering civilization. Listen closely:

WWIII: 'The mother of all national security issues'
Still you're in denial? Can't see, hear, believe? You hope we come back?

WWIII: 'By 2020 there is little doubt something drastic is happening'
More denial. We think short-term, this quarter, this election cycle. It'll work out.

WWIII: 'The planet's carrying capacity is shrinking'
And yet still you refuse to listen. It all sounds too eco-freak lefty.

WWIII: 'Desperate, all-out wars over food, water, and energy supplies'
Still you dismiss it as hype, propaganda, brainwashing from the Pentagon war machine. And, yes, historians and shrinks agree you will stay in denial ... till it's too late. Proof? Remember Jeremy Grantham. A savvy investor managing $100 billion in assets. Listen to his take on the 2008 meltdown: "Several dozen people saw this crisis coming for years. It seemed so inevitable and so merciless. Yet the bosses of Merrill Lynch and Citi, even Paulson and Bernanke, none saw it coming."

Greed blinds us. So we will be unprepared, miss the next disaster, meltdown, catastrophe ... the coming WWIII. Why can't we open our eyes? Wake up before it's too late? Why don't we learn the lessons of history? Sadly, centuries of history prove we never change ... till it's too late.

Proof? Remember "This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly" by Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, two brilliant economists. They warn: "The lesson of history is there will always be a temptation to stretch the limits. One common theme, excessive debt accumulation -- whether government, banks, corporations, or consumers -- often poses greater systemic risks than it seems during a boom. We merrily roll along for an extended period, when bang ... confidence collapses, lenders disappear, a crisis hits. History does point to warnings signs that policy makers can look to access risk -- if only they do not become too drunk with their credit-bubble-fueled success and say, as their predecessors have for centuries, 'This time is different.'"

We're addicts, more is never enough, we ignore history lessons
Humans are addicted to greed, success, wealth. More is never enough: "The lesson of history is there will always be a temptation to stretch the limits." Leaders always stretch the limits, like gamblers who just can't go home till they lose everything. Besides, that "mother of all national security issues won't happen till 2020?" Too far in the future, so our short-term brains dismiss it. ... So what if "the planet's carrying capacity in shrinking?" ... So what if "an ancient pattern of desperate, all-out wars over food, water, and energy supplies is emerging?" ... So what if "warfare defines human life?"

So what else is new? Wars: WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan. Think positive. Wars create new economic opportunities. The "green revolution." Job growth. Commodity deals. Innovations. Think positive. Technology will solve all future problems. Have faith. Trust. Wait. Enjoy life now.

Yes, WWIII is coming. And in 2020 we may wake up and remember we were warned about the disastrous consequences of invading Iraq back during the invasion when Nixon advisor Kevin Phillips wrote in Wealth and Democracy, warning: "Most great nations, at the peak of their economic power, become arrogant, wage great world wars at great cost, wasting vast resources, taking on huge debt, and ultimately burning themselves out."

The real reason ... we love wars, it's a macho ego thing
Now shift from the lessons of history to the lessons of psychology. Forget everything the Pentagon says. It's a distraction. The real reason WWIII is coming is not because "they" are attacking "us." ... Not because the GOP, Tea-Party, Reaganites and their beloved Reaganomics all love a crisis. ... Not because the Right believes it's written in Revelations ... Not because a secret conspiracy of the superwealthy believe wars are great for economic recovery.

No, WWIII is coming because Americans love war; it's in our psyche, genes, DNA, blood, our cultural mythology. Deep in our souls we are greedy war-mongers, war-profiteers ... we love wars. WWIII is coming because America needs a war to prove that we really are still "king of the hill," the world's sole superpower. That we're not falling second to China and the rest of the world. Forget economics, politics, ideologies: WWIII is a macho ego thing.

We want to revive the days when John Wayne, Patton, "The Dirty Dozen," "Apocalypse Now" defined us; we were a nation of war heroes. Now our "heroes" are corrupt Wall Street fat-cat CEOs who lose billions and still retire rich, con men for Treasury secretaries, bought presidents, governors who resign early, lie to grand juries and walk the Appalachian trail, ad infinitum. We have lost face, lost faith in our heroes, in our world. Unlike thousands indicted after the S&L and Enron disasters, our dark heroes "get away with murder."

Destiny knocks ... the Righteous Right will lead us into WWIII
WWIII is coming because America needs a war, another great war. Admit it. We all sense it at a deep level. Yes we hate to admit the truth. It hurts too much to admit our moral weakness: America's losing power, swagger, mojo, cohones. We don't like feeling impotent, weak, vulnerable. So the bullying Right, the insecure, defensive and full-of-hate, dark side of the Party-of-No-No has decided to be the champion-of-the-return-to-the-glory-days ... and they are itching for new wars.

First: before WWIII we prepare with internal civil wars. The Right attacks the Left, spewing lies, feeding rage everywhere like the angry high school bully who lost the election for class president because his future was pure self-serving narcissism. Now ego bruised, second-best, he's consumed by hatred and revenge. Anything to regain the throne, no matter how immoral, corrupt, mean-spirited -- the end justifies the means.

WWIII is coming because once the Right gets back in power -- and they will soon -- a new Righteous Right White House will act swiftly to reestablish its sole superpower role. Remember "bomb, bomb, bomb Iran?" Under the laughter a hidden agenda. Some foreign-policy pundits agree we'd already be at war with Iran (and Islam) if the Bullying Right won the presidency.
When they win back the commander-in-chief role it will happen again, a repeat of the Cheney deceits that drove America into the Iraq-Afghan Wars.

WWIII will be intoxicating ... but will bankrupt the drunk's soul
Chris Hedges captures America's bizarre collective addiction to war. In "War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning" this former war correspondent describes how a "communal march against an enemy generates a warm, unfamiliar bond with our neighbors, our community, our nation, wiping out unsettling undercurrents of alienation and dislocation."

He reminds me of my days going off to the Marine Corps and Korea. As one reviewer put it, Hedges looks "at what makes war so intoxicating for soldiers, politicians and ordinary citizens," the "outbreaks of nationalism, the wartime silencing of intellectuals and artists, the ways in which even a supposedly skeptical press glorifies the battlefield and other universal features of war." Yes, yes, we love war.

WWIII is coming not because we have terrorists, dictators and evil men wanting to destroy and depose us. Not because "they" are attacking "us." WWIII is coming because we have surrendered the fight, surrendered our honor, our integrity, our values, our moral compass as a democracy. We have surrendered to a new god, to the almighty dollar, the new Invisible Hand that controls not just capitalism but our nation's very soul.

Bottom line: We are at war with ourselves. Split souls, a hero, a demon. But we do not like ourselves, can no longer face ourselves in the mirror. Why? Our dark side is winning. The other has surrendered. We have lost our "self" in denial. Now the Righteous Right is bullying us with hope of redemption. False hope. That's suicide. Still we are waiting to start World War III. And if the wait is too long, the Right will start to "bomb, bomb, bomb" someone and trigger WWIII. It's a macho "ego thing." They got a lot to prove. Don't care if they destroy America in the process ... because they know they are Right. Yes, folks, the real "mother of all national security issues" is within us


Starcade said...

You see, this is what people don't get.

Take a look at the unemployment (real unemployment -- Shadowstats) rate when Fannie and Freddie were nationalized.

Take a look at it now.

Consumer spending, construction, and so many jobs RELIED on house-as-ATM.

The rules of sane economics went out the door a long time ago.

And if all we are is "consumers"...

James Madison said...

Is Stoneleigh speaking at the North Olmsted Recreation Center at 26000 Lorain Road, North Olmsted, OH 44070 on Sept 9th at 7:00PM?

The Automatic Earth website makes reference to the “Community Center”. Is this the same thing as the “Recreation Center”?

The Recreation Center’s website doesn’t list upcoming events. I don’t want to drive 6 hours and end up at the wrong location!

Ilargi said...


I just changed it as you were writing. It's at the North Olmsted library at 5.30 pm.


Fuser said...


That was my fault in not noticing the community center was booked. She is scheduled to be at the North Olmsted Library at 5:30.

27403 Lorain Road
North Olmsted, OH 44070-4037
(440) 777-6211

Anonymous said...

Kudos Ilargi, for such a powerful post. And I couldn't agree more. Our government right now is like deer in headlights, but we know which way they'll jump, so it gives us a little warning.

Ladies and Gents, TSHTF!

There is no where to go but down; they've shot their wad with no reload possible due to the GOP opposition. And our government probably does owe somewhere north of $300 Trillion if everything was counted. I doubt we'll ever get the true number, even post meltdown. There will be estimates of course.

I wanted to include a follow up to the link I posted earlier this week regarding hyper-inflation. There is some clarification from the author if you're interested in reading:

Again, I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with this point of view, but in times like these it's important to be open to and consider different scenarios.

BTW, I called the WH comment line today and ranted a bit about the BP lies, why Obama hasn't already nominated Elizabeth Warren, and something that hasn't been discussed too much and which is consolidation's effect on jobs. Most of the discussion has been outsourcing related, but the other culprit is all the mergers resulting in a lower requirement for labor. If we just enforced the Sherman Antitrust Act, millions of jobs could be opened up and the public would benefit from increased competition.

It's ridiculous to have one, maybe two major providers in almost any category you can think of. And it doesn't have to be this way.

Stoneleigh said...

James Madison,

Where are you driving from? I may end up closer to you than 6 hours away. I'll be going from Ohio to Michigan, to Wisconsin to Minnesota and then further south. I have invitations to Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma, and I'll be speaking at the ASPO conference in Washington DC in early October. In a different direction, people also asked me to come to Montana, Wyoming and California. I'm trying to turn all that into some kind of sensible itinerary at the moment. I expect to be in the US for a couple of months, which should give me some scope for getting around.

Kurt said...

I think someone already linked this followup on how hyperinflation will happen in the US:

I&S, do you disagree with the author? Since his scenario is predicated on the collapse of the bond market, I'm curious if this is how you believe a hyperinflation is likely to occur after the deflation has run its course.

Bukko Boomeranger said...

Vignette from my life about housing market denial:

My wife's brother has a fully-paid-for McMansion in the kind of car-dependent suburb Kunstler despises near Charlotte, N.C. This spring, he wanted to move back to Ohio (was in the Air Force there) so he bought another oversized house there. Figured he'd sell his house in N.C. with no problem. It's been on the market for six months now, no luck.

Doomers that we are, my wife and I advised him against making such a move without lining up a deal on his N.C. home. We got the standard answer "Things aren't so bad. It'll sell." My wife talked to her bro a couple days ago -- same attitude. "Housing prices have bottomed out. Things will get better."

He's LIVING in what we've been predicting, but still doesn't see it. When we talk about negative economic news, he gives it the same response that most people give 9/11 Troofers -- doesn't even bother to argue back, just regards it as so silly that it's not worth discussing.

The brother isn't hurting. He was a prudent guy, played by the rules in that era when the rules were still obeyed, has retirement money built up. I don't know the finances on his new house (which has 5 bedrooms, 4 1/2 bathrooms for the two people living in it.) But I have no doubt he's costed out the new mortgage and whatever expenses he has on the paid-off, unoccupied home. (Two people -- in control of two humongous suburban houses -- is that the American Dream, or what?)

People on doomy blogs often wonder "Why are there still crowds lined up to get into the Cheesecake Factory?" Well, lots of people in those lines are like my BiL. They're the ones who have already "made it" under the old rules. They've got a cushion, and they're going to spend it. (He's not extravagant, but not tightwad, either.) If you're up-and-coming, if you're working class, or if you're old and unready, you're up against the wall. But if you're bourgeois, you can keep pretending.

Sylvester M. McBean said...

As a private investor* who has sought a plan much like Fairfax Financial's just two comments:

1) Is of course the standard that any derivative contract incurs counter-party risk and with the lack of regulation and transparency there the risk is huge (Hell, I personally know of two firms who because they did their Due Diligence avoided AIG for their CDS positions.. both got screwed)

2) The CPI numbers have been lies for years, adjustments to the basket and the calculations have constantly under reported actual inflation. What makes anyone think that they wont take the opportunity to back out many of these adjustments and under report Deflation? I doubt you would get a contract based on John Williams (Shadow Stats) data.

There will of course be significant preasure to under report Deflation, why start telling the truth now?

*Taking it as a given that private investors are always screwed, there should be a method where by Joe Guy could profit here … just haven’t figured it out yet.

Gravity said...

Why is there something rather than everything?

rcg1950 said...

Gravity asks...

Why is there something rather than everything?

I guess a lot of people have asked this, most famously Leibnitz (whose answer, perhaps somewhat unfairly, became the butt of ridule).

Just an interested lay person, but I have gotten the sense that speculations in theoretical physics as it pertains to 'eternal inflation models' and 'many world' interpretations of QM proposes what for me is an intellectually satisfying answer. That eventually the multiverse will produce 'everything'. (see Max Tegmark)

I suspect you know quite a bit more about this than I can hope to understand and am curious as to your take on it.

[Sorry about the off topic nature of this. Couldn't resist Gravity's queery.]

jal said...


The brother isn't hurting. He was a prudent guy, played by the rules in that era when the rules were still obeyed, has retirement money built up.... But if you're bourgeois, you can keep pretending.

Before the present crash, 1.0% of the population had any idea of how finances worked. Now it is closer to 10%.
1.0% coincides with the very wealthy.
10% also happens to coincide with the percentage of people that control the wealth and have all the savings and pay most of the taxes.

This is the HERD, 10% of the population.
When enough of them get to see the light they will stampede for the exit and bring down the system.

It is imperative that the blinkers be kept on these people for as long as possible.

jal said...

For those that are having difficulties getting THE MARKET TICKER.

The primary colocation server suffered a significant hardware failure early on the morning of August 27th.
Colocation service technicians are on the case and working the issue. The Ticker itself has been cut over to the hot backup and is available at this time, as access to the Ticker requires only read access to the system.

The forum has not, as a decision to do so forces a requirement for a full table resync back to the master when it is restored, a process that can take as much as 36 hours, and due to bandwidth constraints at TickerCentral such a decision also forces significant degredation of available service on the userbase for that entire 36-hour period. For this reason a decision to take this action has been deferred until we have an accurate restoration estimate on the hardware.

No data has been lost - the replication system has a complete copy and has been checked for consistency.

The hardware fault has been repaired - we are now checking data integrity: it appears we will have to restore the boot partition but NOT the data. Progress on restoration contiunues - no ETA at this time.

This page will be updated as is appropriate through the day.

Thank you for your patience.

Last update: 09:59 CT 8/27

Gravity said...

It has been announced that 'housing price inflation' in Britain slightly eased this month. Although its a furious fallacy to equate such price fluctuations with the delayed workings of monetary curvature, nonflationary price movements in housing should be especially able to directly influence genuine flationary tendencies, depending on whose balance sheets they're burdening.

Out of the common fallacyflations, this housing price inflation actually contains an operative component broadly influencing uniplier curvature, perhaps its the least erroneous of the commonly used misinflations when properly causally inverted.

jal said...

It is necessary to liquidate, raise money, to pay out those that have seen the light.
ING SOLD ITS Asian Private Banking business to OCBC
ING SOLD ITS Insurance Units TO RAISE $11.3 Billion

ING to sell its stake in Canadian property portfolio

Amsterdam, ING announced today that it has agreed to sell its 50% stake in ING Summit Industrial Fund LP (Summit), a Canadian light industrial property portfolio to a joint venture between KingSett Capital and Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo).

Summit is a real estate investment fund that focuses on Canadian light industrial real estate. The fund’s portfolio comprises over 400 industrial properties located primarily in major metropolitan markets in Canada.
KingSett Capital is Canada’s leading private equity real estate investment business co-investing with pension funds and high net worth individuals. AIMCo is one of Canada’s largest institutional investors. It manages about CAD 70 billion of Alberta public sector pension and endowment assets, including a real estate portfolio valued in excess of CAD 5 billion.

Gravity said...

In corporatist america, mortgages default on you.

Bigelow said...

"Kotlikoff and Ferguson called for "limited purpose banking" (LPB), that would "limit banks to their legitimate purpose - financial intermediation and payment facilitation.""

Good idea! But that would remove so much of the potential for fraud; they couldn't do it. Making banking as just another utility, like sewer or water service, was something Nassim Taleb called for awhile back.

Anonymous said...

@Starcade "The rules of sane economics went out the door a long time ago."

Back when I still bothered to attempt to explain to people that even if everything was somehow stabilized, the fact that the entire (FIRE) economy was based on housing prices increasing at a 10-15% annual rate meant that it was all over.

As many are now finding out, "we don't have game". That is, we don't have nuthin'.

@Westcoastliberal "And it doesn't have to be this way."

This is why I have problems with idealistic libs - yes, Virginia, it DOES have to be this way. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Once you realize we live in a fascist oligarchy fueled by both powerful warfare & welfare interests, it's a waste of emotional energy to lament our collective reality.

Best to just understand what is occurring and figure out a way to survive.

Shamba said...

JAL, thank you for the informtation, I wondered what was happening there, my connections trouble at their end.

peace, shamba

rcg1950 said...

thoughts after reading Ilargi today.

Yes house prices in America are bloated. Education systems here are bloated, and of course medical systems. The milatary. The financial system. The political system. Incomes, pensions, transport. America's sense of it's importance and righteousness and entitlement -- all grossly bloated. Everyone's expectations for themselves, their rights, their station in life, the material success they deserve, the quantity and types of food they eat - all insanely bloated and dysfunctional. The whole system runs on bloat. Only it can't any longer. The realization of this has begun. For many (not a majority in my opinion, but a significant and violent prone number), the realization leads to anger, resentment and digging in in the face of the new realities. For others, maybe even a majority for whatever that is worth (not much), there is a feeling much like one gets after gorging on too much rich food. We'd probably all feel better if we disgorged, if we could only figure out a way to puke without blowing apart the whole bloated house. But TPTB want to keep force feeding us like fois gras. Ugh!

Bigelow said...

Banks back switch to renminbi for trade

Lindsay said...

NZ taxpayers to bail out failing finance company:

Hmm, this seems familiar.

Iconoclast421 said...

Just an update on my trades I entered this week. So far all put options are losing money, but my hedge (the HL sept 5 calls) has tripled. I'm rolling out of the sept $5 calls and moving into october $7 calls. Taking some profits and using those to bring my put positions back to even. BAC nov 10 puts are 23 cents today.

thethirdcoast said...

@ Bukko & jal,

Here in Western NY people are pretending right along. My workweek is currently four 10 hour days. I used this afternoon to run errands, and I was amazed by the volume of traffic on the roads here. Post office was packed. The upscale mall (yeah, I know) in this area was also packed wall-to-wall. I couldn't believe it.

I could only wonder if anyone in this country works anymore and how such crowds were possible if real unemployment is running near 20%. I just don't get it.

Bukko Boomeranger said...

@ thethirdcoast, even if 20% of the population is un/underemployed, that still leaves 80% which is working! (Plus all the retirees who are sitting on a pile of money, and there are many.) They keep on doing what they're accustomed to, keeping up appearances, because that's all the know

There's a quote that sticks in my mind, not sure where it originated, but it was applied to the Yugoslavian break-up: "There's a lot of ruin in a country." Meaning, a nation has a lot of hidden resources that can be used up, even when it's falling apart. That could be said of a Second World country like Yugoslavia, and it's true in a full deck of spades with a reserve currency country like the U.S.

Punxsutawney said...

West Coast -

Consolidation, Exactly!

All this Monopoly Capitalism is doing the average working person no favors, but simply further concentrates wealth. I can quickly think of five different mergers in my neck of the woods where the local companies were bought and the headquarters and and at least some of the operations closed. Two of which affected me personally and one affected one of my neighboors.

thethirdcoast said...

@ Bukko,

Great points. Indeed there is still a great deal of slack in the US, and that is probably why there is not more overt anger amongst the populace.

It's Friday night, and I just got rejected for an opportunity to leave my extremely toxic job so I'm off to engage in my #1 hobby.

Cheers y'all.

Wyote said...

Hey Snefling, define "welfare interests"for us.

Jal: "10% also happens to coincide with the percentage of people that control the wealth and have all the savings and pay most of the taxes."

Now what taxes are you referring to?
property? sales? income? food? cause maybe you wanna check out that
"The fallacy of cheap home prices and the two income trap." article (in today's post) again.
Perhaps think of taxes relative to income.

Ventriloquist said...

FOFOA today has a pithy, excellent comment on the hyperinflation debate:

And what sets the stage for hyperinflation is a period of high credibility inflation followed by the loss of credibility. During our period of high credibility inflation the dollar was invisibly hyperinflated in a near-monetary sense. This has already happened. We are already there.

When I say the dollar has already hyperinflated in a near-monetary sense, I am talking about the number of dollars people, entities and even foreign nations think they have in reserve. Not in a shoebox, but in contractual promises of dollars to be delivered more or less on demand by somebody else. Claims denominated in dollars.

This is how the vast majority of "dollars" are held; as promises to deliver more dollars. And this is why they are held this way. Because of the MORE in "more dollars." "Let me spend your dollars today and I will give you more dollars tomorrow!"

I would love to see a coherent online debate between FOFOA and our gentle hosts on the imminence of hyperinflation. I have immense respect for both of these blogs. They both have a significant joint intellect to wrap around such a cogent topic.

However, (I would say as an aside), both Stoneleigh and FOFOA have already checked their egos at the door.

Illargi . . . well, not so much!

But Illargi could provide the fireworks!

;>) LOL!

D. Benton Smith said...

Dear Gravity,

But everything is something.

bluebird said...

Watching a special MSNBC program about the first 5 days of Katrina in 2005. No food, no water, no shelter. People stealing, everyone desperate, angry. Brian Williams remarking he didn't believe this was happening in America. Reliving these events, is seeing the future.

anon10 said...

Today on CNBC-TV's Closing Bell program, one of the guests that Maria Bartiromo interviewed said the following:

"Over the last 30 days credit default swaps on U.S. treasuries have moved up 35 per cent. Now as we all know that's the cost to insure against the default on U.S. treasuries, 35 per cent. So with rates plummeting and credit default swaps rising something's got to give."

The following is the link to the video which has this quote on it. After you click on the link you may have to watch a 15 second commercial first. When the main video starts use the slider to fast forward the video to 4 minutes and 40 seconds to get to the above quote.

anon10 said...

The Canadian consumer is saying "Damn the recession/depression, full speed ahead with borrowing and spending"

The following is from the Bank of Canada web site:

"Two thirds of credit outstanding to households is for residential mortgages."

From July 2009 to July 2010, total household credit in Canada increased by 103.1 Billion$.

The total household credit in Canada as of July 2010 was 1466 billion$

Between Canada's consumers and governments, I think we are going into debt at a faster rate than the United States.

Woody said...

I second Kurt's request for I&S (and others’) opinions on the ZeroHedge/Gonzalo-Lira blog, links to which have been posted here several times in the past two days:



Lira doesn’t state his definition of deflation, but makes a sharp distinction between inflation and hyperinflation, which he defines as “a loss of faith in the currency.”

This may raise some Ilargi-Ire, but Lira seems to parse all the “flations” down to concepts a bit more tangible to individuals than macro-economic theory. He expects that commodity prices will skyrocket while many asset prices plunge. If I understand TAE deflation theory correctly, the debt destruction that's in process is largely in assets and related derivatives whose value is an illusion, soon to vanish like Wile’s cloud of dust.

If both views are true, couldn’t we experience substantial deflation driven by price drops in vast quantities of expensive “assets” that are suddenly recognized as worthless, while prices increase for things we need? (as the mood of the herd swings) If so, I don’t really care whether it’s officially deflation or inflation.

For example, already I see plenty of McMansions for sale at greatly reduced prices, but good available farmland that's not too remote seems to be relatively scarce and still relatively expensive.

Lira’s views re-mind Stoneleigh’s advice about how quickly things can radically change.

Can you guys expose flaws in Lira’s arguments? TPTB have already surprised many of us with their audacity. As they continue to bail/flail and extend/pretend, does that delay both deflation and eventual hyperinflation, or does it just compress the duration and depth of deflation, leaving insufficient time to react?

jal said...

bluebird said...
“Reliving these events, is seeing the future.”
If you really want to see something sickening, ... if you can find it in mainstream media, keep your eye on what is happening in Pakistan. It is 100 times worst and getting worst every day. That is the future happening NOW.
Warning: ... for adults viewing ONLY

Wyote said...

Dr Jeff Masters Weather Underground blog posts:

The Northwest and Northeast Passages are open.

"The Northwest Passage--the legendary shipping route through ice-choked Canadian waters at the top of the world--melted free of ice last week, and is now open for navigation, according to satellite mosaics available from the National Snow and Ice Data Center and The University of Illinois Cryosphere Today. This summer marks the fourth consecutive year--and fourth time in recorded history--that the fabled passage has opened for navigation. Over the past four days, warm temperatures and southerly winds over Siberia have also led to intermittent opening of the Northeast Passage, the shipping route along the north coast of Russia through the Arctic Ocean. It is now possible to completely circumnavigate the Arctic Ocean in ice-free waters, and this will probably be the case for at least a month. This year marks the third consecutive year--and the third time in recorded history--that both the Northwest Passage and Northeast Passage have melted free, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center. The Northeast Passage opened for the first time in recorded history in 2005, and the Northwest Passage in 2007. It now appears that the opening of one or both of these northern passages is the new norm, and business interests are taking note--commercial shipping in the Arctic is on the increase, and there is increasing interest in oil drilling. The great polar explorers of past centuries would be astounded at how the Arctic has changed in the 21st century."

Great pics as well.

Anonymous said...


The problem with Lira's views is he constructs a specific scenario, like some sort of spy novel, then bases his entire set of predictions off that specific scenario. I&S have and continue to talk about basic principles, using history, biology, psychology, and even a bit of economics as their guides.

Second, I&S (and Mish and Denninger and lots of other "deflationists") have all stated that sure, it's possible we'll get hyperinflation (as defined in monetary terms, not prices) somewhere down the line. But before we get there, credit deleveraging has to mostly play out first and we're nowhere near that yet.

Third, I&S have consistently talked about how lower prices during deflation (if they occur) may not mean more affordable products. Wages and salaries are already down more nationwide than prices so far. That road doesn't lead to more affordable living but to less affordable living, even as some or many prices decline.

In short, Lira has a story, like a Tom Clancy novel. Maybe it's plausible (I don't think so) and maybe it's not. I&S have a theory, like quantum mechanics or relativity, that can be applied regardless of the specific circumstances that actually evolve in the micro-economy.

The difference is pretty profound.

NOTE: I'm not even going into Lira's consistent abuse of the terms inflation, deflation, and hyperinflation. He seems to have his own unique dictionary that defies everyone else's agreement as to the definition of those words, so it's no wonder he can construct his own self-reinforcing storyline.

James Madison said...


Thanks for postings these provocative articles.

They both generated a mountain of comments at Zerohedge.

I think anyone who reads the first dozen paragraphs of Gonzalo Lira’s first article will be hooked and have to finish them both. And I say this even if you’re in the deflation camp (as I am).

Anonymous said...

@ Wyote said...
Hey Snefling, define "welfare interests" for us.

Sounds like a sensitive lib took the bait. Answer: Fannie & Freddie.

Welfare isn't just a set of narrowly defined programs that transfer income from productive earners to leechf*cks.

At its grandest manifestation, welfare is a when a state comes to dominate all domestic economic activity, while warfare primarily handles foreign policy execution. (With loop back channels for both industrial policy & citizen controls.)

From the perspective of the fascist oligarchy, they could hardly be bothered to care about the intrinsic component(s) of either sphere, as long as they sit at the top siphoning off the wealth.

The game is played to a fine pitch by relying on partisans to quickly respond and rush to the defense upon real and perceived attacks on their particular "program".

Good job. Perhaps a needy banker made an add'l million today due to your efforts.

Ric said...

However, (I would say as an aside), both Stoneleigh and FOFOA have already checked their egos at the door.

Illargi . . . well, not so much!

One of my favorite sports is trail running in wilderness terrain where a slip can send you careening two thousand feet onto rocks. If I'm running with someone who sees me slipping and puts out his hand to pull me back, does it matter what his ego is like? If you're worried about ego, you don't understand the problem. Last I checked, TAE is free.

BTW--on the subject of Ilargi, it recently occurred to me who his recorded voice reminds me of: Doug Ingle. In A Gadda Da Vida - Iron Butterfly

Wyote said...


Spoken like a true libertarian. Bundling all activities of government under the bailiwick of fascism is your greatest dream, your greatest fear. What exactly is your problem with Social Security and Medicare?

I’m certainly aware of the military / industrial / financial domination of most government actions. I just don’t abandon the worth of government totally. Especially when it comes to providing for the elderly, the disabled and endangered youth.

My guess is that you would like to be that banker; best of luck.

Bukko Boomeranger said...

@ Woody, it was a slow midnight shift at work yesterday, so I read both parts of Lira. While he had some good concepts and I like his writing style -- peppered-up with profanity, but not gratuitously so -- his screenplay did not ring true.

I agree with Greyzone that Lira's downschluss scenario seems far-fetched. It's like a survivalists' apocalyptic cavalcade, only with dollars instead of zombies pushing the plot. He gives too much credence to a triggering event, then assumes every player will stampede quickly and in unison. That could happen -- see September 2008 -- but only if powerful economic drovers are pushing it for their own purposes (see Hank Paulson/VampSquid in 9/08).

I don't just want to pick apart the specifics of Lira's script, though. I also think his philosophy on human behaviour is too classically "well-educated libertarian." He expects everyone to act like Homo Economicus, Greedhead Variant. People and institutions stumble, things unfold slowly, and there are always counter-measures taken in the midst. Lira gave a nod to possible actions that the Fraudo'erall Reserve would take, but I say he underestimates the complexity of things. That analysis is also U.S. centric, with little attention paid to how the rest of the world would play out.

His slagging of Salvador Allende also rubbed me the wrong way. I'm in the midst of reading "Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein. (I realize it's old; came out in 2007, but still relevant today. Including the part about how a mad Canadian doctor in the 1950s helped the CIA develop mind-fucking techniques that are being used to drive "enemy combatants" mad in America's torture prisons. Canada -- not as innocent as everybody thinks!)

Anyway, the September 11th coup in Chile was as much an economic shock therapy to "set things right" by Chicago School Friedmaniacs as it was a military thug-up. Life got way worse for Chileans under Pinochet. When I see someone like Lira play up the bad things under Allende (neglecting the role that predator corpos and the U.S. government played in making that happen) and downplay the dictatorship, it makes me discount what he has to say. Like most apocalyptic academics in their comfy chairs, I think he WANTS economic shock therapy for the U.S. because it seems so kewl! On paper, at least.

Trashing aside, Lira's idea that hyperinflation will happen when the herd loses confidence in a currency is a concept worth remembering. I can see that happening. But not until there's something to replace the suddenly non-credible U.S. dollar with as a medium of exchange globally.

Panic-buying of commodities won't do that. You can't maintain a complex civilization by what would be a barter system, "my pile of copper for your crate of semiconductors." And if the conspiracy theories about the Anglo-U.S. attack on the euro are true, there will be a hard slog before any alternative to the dollar emerges.

One more faulting of Lira's analysis -- if anything like a sudden hyperinflation happened, he underestimates the chaos that would cause in America. It would become Argentina 2000, with added bullets. All that it will take is for the tun veneer of order to be ripped away, and I think things will get unimaginably nasty. I just hope that I, and Lira, are wrong.

Unknown said...

Can't argue with pretty much anything that you have said Ilargi.

Throughout his campaign there was always a niggling thought in my head that said, "when a job ceases to be worth having (like teaching or nursing for example, and now POTUS) the women and the minorities are allowed in."

Worth having, not mentioning whether it is worth doing.

Obama was given a poisoned chalice and both he, and his race, will pay for it with generations of being labelled as "the kind of people not up to the job".

There is one thing you don't mention, however, that is also crucial to extend and pretend.

When this this is finally, fully resolved, people are going to die. Many people, perhaps in their millions, certainly in hundreds of thousands; both in the US and around the world.

They will die of malnutrition, if not outright starvation, they will die in domestic and community violence even if not in a world war.

Another 20% or 30% off hosue values? I CAN imagine what that will do, and it will lead to dead people.

Fault Obama and co for many things, but trying desperately to find a way for this to play out that doesn't involve killing a lot of people is an honourable goal. Give them credit for that.

peter said...

provides many nice quotes.
"The powers that govern cannot or do not have the will to restructure the economy and our society but expect us to restructure our lives just the same."
"Maybe you have a home that you cannot sell and you are stuck living 20 miles or more from your workplace and your car is fast reaching the point when you will need a new one just to get to work."

The collapse will not be sudden, just a steady destruction in the quality of life. (some areas collapse a bit quicker/unevenly than others)

carpe diem said...

Seems the front page of the huffington post is all about this meeting of 'minds' that just took place. The general consensus including Roubini is echoing everything that Ilargi and Stoneleigh have been saying all along. One still senses some tiptoeing around the facts but at least one or two words of truth are now being spoken. If they told the whole truth and less diplomatically then they are now, I'm quite sure everyone would start seriously losing their minds. They can't afford an entire nation freaking out en masse.

ogardener said...

Fed 'will strongly resist' deflation: Bernanke

Economy will grow in second half, pickup in 2011

Bernanke: Fed still has tools

Bernanke said there was only a low risk of deflation. But he acknowledged that inflation has dropped to a level slightly below that which FOMC participants view "as most conducive to a healthy economy in the long run."

He spoke at length about the tools left in his toolkit to fight deflation and promised to use them if the outlook deteriorated significantly.

What tools?

bluebird said...

@peter - interesting comments at the argonist article that you posted.

jal said...

In reference to the economy and to the social structures it is necessary to identify the OPERATORS and the DETAILED OPERATIONS of a RESET.
It is also necessary to have a timeframe or flow chart of events that will be affected. (There is no such thing as instantaneous time travel to a past that once existed).

The present keeps going forward into tomorrow.

We are have started the RESET PROCESS/PROGRAM. I suspect that even the operators do not know if there will be BUGS in the RESET PROGRAM.

A HARD RESET must be avoided.


jal said...

Definitions: reset

1. adjust again after an initial failure

2. The form reset is used in the present tense and is the past tense and past participle.  If you reset a machine or device, you adjust or set it, so that it is ready to work again or ready to perform a particular function.  verb 

3. A Reset is an operation that allows an administrator or operator to set a value to a new value, regardless of their current value.

4. The verb RESET has 3 senses:
A. set anew

B. set to zero

C. adjust again after an initial failure

5. The 'counter-increment' property accepts one or more names of counters (identifiers), each one optionally followed by an integer. The integer indicates by how much the counter is incremented for every occurrence of the element. The default increment is 1. Zero and negative integers are allowed.
The 'counter-reset' property also contains a list of one or more names of counters, each one optionally followed by an integer. The integer gives the value that the counter is set to on each occurrence of the element. The default is 0.
The keywords 'none', 'inherit' and 'initial' must not be used as counter names. A value of 'none' on its own means no counters are reset, resp. incremented. 'Inherit' on its own has its usual meaning (see 6.2.1). 'Initial' is reserved for future use.

6. A soft reboot (also known as a warm reboot, in contrast to a cold reboot) is restarting a computer under software control, without removing power or (directly) triggering a reset line. It usually, though not always, refers to an orderly shut-down then reboot.
The Control-Alt-Delete key combination on the original IBM PC was designed to allow a soft reboot for a quicker and more convenient (and, some argue, less stressful on system components) restart than powering the computer completely down then back up.

7. A system reset made by pressing the computer's Reset button or by turning the power off and then on again.

A hard reset is used only when the system has crashed so badly that pressing Ctrl+Alt+Del to reboot does not work.


zander said...

I'm walking around my local Homebase today, - which is a big box hardware store for non UK readers - and apart from it looking like death warmed up - activity wise, I couldn't help but notice that as I looked at the racks with the huge discount offers (seemed like everything in store was offering a % off) I found myself thinking "no way" even at 80% off I'm still like "that's way too much" and I'm wondering if a deflationary mindset has set in for me, much like Stoneleigh and Prechter often allude to, I'm a tight wad at the best of times mind you, but something has definitely changed in my perception of value. strange.


bluebird said...

Spouse agrees that there needs to be a reset. But reset to What? He is unable to explain. Yet he still believes there will be no implosion or collapse, that his world is going to continue just like it always has.

Tom Therramus said...

@Woody - Tx for the heads-up.

Read the Lira piece - it was nicely done - albeit that spelling was challenged here and there. Particularly liked the idea that inflation and hyperinflation may be two separate phenomena.

@Greyzone- you overstate the the differences in approach between TAE and Lira. Both positions are hypothesis-driven. The final form of lurking reality remains inscrutable to most of us- as yet.

This being said, what attracts me to Lira is that this is an individual who appears to have lived with his immediate family through a hyperinflationary crisis. This experience also appears to have been a salient point of reflection by the writer over many years.

Experience of an existential calamity is a sure teacher of what variables matter and what theories actually are worth subscribing to - ones survival depends on it.

It also brings me back to Aaron and his recent essay. This peice was also well written and stemmed from a data driven perspective. But my critique remains as its was. Namely Aaron's view point was too narrow and too close to unfolding events to be of any use - at least to me.

I have been pondering Aaron's work and my response to him all the same. IMO What Aaron, and perhaps I&S miss, is the slow turning lathe of globalization.

How its grinding surfaces continue to reshape the world.

How the middle class of large resource hungry emerging economies (e.g., BRICs) are becoming increasing more effective in going after what is left of American middle class wealth.

Globalization will create economic non-uniformities that appear to have deflationary characteristics within and between nations - e.g., as is presently being suggested in the US.

However, in the long-run convergence by BRIC-like nations with their relatively young, growing and ambitious populaces on what we have, together with dwindling resource bases, seem more likely to drive global inflationary trends in the price of goods and services.

Anonymous said...

The problem, Tom Therramus, that NO INFLATIONIST EVER ANSWERS when I put it out there is this - hyperinflation will destroy the Fed AND the special powers of the US dollar to impose a $1.2-$1.8 TRILLION hidden tax on the entire world each year. Further, the Fed is independent of the government and does not act as the government wishes. So tell me again exactly why the Fed would take a path that will result in its own destruction?

If you point to Argentina or Weimar Germany or Zimbabwe, I will point back and note that those central banks were controlled by the politicians directly. Here, the politicians are owned and controlled by the banks.

Hyperinflation destroys the lender so why would the Fed and its member banks choose to hyperinflate?

No one ever answers this question. No one ever explains why the Fed would commit suicide and destroy its most valuable tool, the dollar, when the Fed IS the most powerful financial entity on the planet. Everyone just says "Oh they'll print" and never examines the unique position of the US Fed. Well if they were going to print, why haven't they done it already? And don't point at money numbers because almost all money indexes like M1 and M2 fail to account for credit. Mish has covered this endlessly, credit IS money and therefore has to be counted as such and we've seen the Fed print maybe $3 trillion while the global economy has imploded by nearly $60 trillion from what I can count (and I haven't bothered to count in months).

In other words, the Fed is not trying to inflate at all. And people who point at the money the Fed prints and gives to the big banks are missing the picture. The Fed is not trying to reflate the economy despite public noise to that same idea. What the Fed is really doing is printing just enough to ensure that its member banks, particularly the NY banks, have enough cash on hand to squelch any run on their banks.

I've watched them playing this pattern for a while now. And why would they allow a deflationary collapse instead of a hyperinflationary collapse? Because the Fed believes that the politicians will take most of the blame for that AND that the Fed's member banks, again particularly the NY banks, will ultimately end up holding all the real assets via defaults.

Normally if an asset defaults, the bank has lost that money and now is in the hole in terms of paying back depositors. But with the Fed printing just enough to ensure none of the banks can be destroyed by a run, that problem is eliminated, and the banks can foreclose on assets over time.

Ben's not going to hyperinflate, ever. It ain't happenin', sir. He's going to try to tread water as he is now to ensure maximum value returned to the banks. I believe he will fail but nonetheless we are three years into an endless deflationary spiral and he hasn't printed yet. But the deflationists have been correct for 3 years now.

Tell me again when the hyperinflationists are going to be correct? I'll tell you when - when the politicians take the Fed back into the government and out of the hands of the NY banks, and not one minute before.

Ilargi said...

New post up.

One more time: GDP and CMI